Re: [9fans] libframe Go port

2015-10-16 Thread Bakul Shah
On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 12:07:08 - Giles Hutton wrote: > > Initially my main complaint was simply the heavy use of the mouse; it felt > jarring to have to move my hand off home row. However, I've now just > chalked that up to inexperience with acme. > Right now I actually can't think of anything

Re: [9fans] libframe Go port

2015-10-11 Thread Giles Hutton
Initially my main complaint was simply the heavy use of the mouse; it felt jarring to have to move my hand off home row. However, I've now just chalked that up to inexperience with acme. Right now I actually can't think of anything I particularly miss about vim text editing, which I guess is why I'

Re: [9fans] libframe Go port

2015-10-11 Thread Staven
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 09:27:57PM +, Giles Hutton wrote: > better than vim, but acme's text editing was a bit too simplistic compared > to vim. So my initial intention was to port acme to Go, and add in vi-style > modal editing. What text editing features from vim do you miss in Acme?

Re: [9fans] libframe Go port

2015-10-10 Thread Kurt H Maier
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 11:38:15AM -0700, Skip Tavakkolian wrote: > yet 9webdraw requires HTML5 features; so it *IS NOT* just javascript (i > think this was your original "contribution" to the conversation) condolences on your tireless devotion to denying javascript is javascript. khm

Re: [9fans] libframe Go port

2015-10-10 Thread Giles Hutton
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 9:57 PM Staven wrote: > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 03:42:42PM +, Giles Hutton wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I'm currently in the process of porting acme to Go > > Why? > I've been asking myself that same question a lot actually. A friend of mine showed me acme a couple of

Re: [9fans] libframe Go port

2015-10-10 Thread Tharaneedharan Vilwanathan
Why not? On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Staven wrote: > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 03:42:42PM +, Giles Hutton wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I'm currently in the process of porting acme to Go > > Why? > > >

Re: [9fans] libframe Go port

2015-10-10 Thread Staven
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 03:42:42PM +, Giles Hutton wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm currently in the process of porting acme to Go Why?

Re: [9fans] libframe Go port

2015-10-10 Thread Skip Tavakkolian
yet 9webdraw requires HTML5 features; so it *IS NOT* just javascript (i think this was your original "contribution" to the conversation) On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Kurt H Maier wrote: > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 11:05:04AM -0700, Skip Tavakkolian wrote: > > it is HTML5 (which includes Java

Re: [9fans] libframe Go port

2015-10-10 Thread Kurt H Maier
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 11:05:04AM -0700, Skip Tavakkolian wrote: > it is HTML5 (which includes JavaScript) by virtue of the fact that i needs > WebSockets support. HTML5 does not include javascript. khm

Re: [9fans] libframe Go port

2015-10-10 Thread Skip Tavakkolian
(and it needs element, etc.) On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Skip Tavakkolian < skip.tavakkol...@gmail.com> wrote: > it is HTML5 (which includes JavaScript) by virtue of the fact that i needs > WebSockets support. > > > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Kurt H Maier wrote: > >> On Sat, Oct 10

Re: [9fans] libframe Go port

2015-10-10 Thread Skip Tavakkolian
it is HTML5 (which includes JavaScript) by virtue of the fact that i needs WebSockets support. On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Kurt H Maier wrote: > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 10:29:06AM -0700, Skip Tavakkolian wrote: > > no need. just use David Hoskin's HTML5 devdraw: > > > > https://bitbucket.

Re: [9fans] libframe Go port

2015-10-10 Thread Kurt H Maier
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 10:29:06AM -0700, Skip Tavakkolian wrote: > no need. just use David Hoskin's HTML5 devdraw: > > https://bitbucket.org/dhoskin/9webdraw that *is* a javascript library. khm

Re: [9fans] libframe Go port

2015-10-10 Thread Skip Tavakkolian
no need. just use David Hoskin's HTML5 devdraw: https://bitbucket.org/dhoskin/9webdraw On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Siarhei Zirukin wrote: > why not a javascript library? > > On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Giles Hutton > wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I'm currently in the process of porting

Re: [9fans] libframe Go port

2015-10-10 Thread Tharaneedharan Vilwanathan
I believe Alef would be great compared to Limbo but not sure if Alef version is a bit out-of-date. On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Skip Tavakkolian < skip.tavakkol...@gmail.com> wrote: > cool. > > did you look at Alef (2nd Ed.) or Limbo version of Acme by any chance? > i'm curious if either of

Re: [9fans] libframe Go port

2015-10-10 Thread Skip Tavakkolian
cool. did you look at Alef (2nd Ed.) or Limbo version of Acme by any chance? i'm curious if either of those might have been easier to translate to Go. On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Giles Hutton wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm currently in the process of porting acme to Go, and as part of that > I

Re: [9fans] libframe Go port

2015-10-10 Thread Siarhei Zirukin
why not a javascript library? On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Giles Hutton wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm currently in the process of porting acme to Go, and as part of that > I'm porting libframe as well. It's currently in a fully transliterated > state and needs a good refactor to make it more idio

Re: [9fans] libframe Go port

2015-10-10 Thread Tharaneedharan Vilwanathan
Hi, Just wanted to let you know I am very eager to see both acme and libframe in Go. Its a great idea. Regards dharani On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Giles Hutton wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm currently in the process of porting acme to Go, and as part of that > I'm porting libframe as well. It'

[9fans] libframe Go port

2015-10-10 Thread Giles Hutton
Hi All, I'm currently in the process of porting acme to Go, and as part of that I'm porting libframe as well. It's currently in a fully transliterated state and needs a good refactor to make it more idiomatic Go. However, my question is whether this is something that people would be keen on using