On Thu Sep 9 09:54:56 EDT 2010, fors...@terzarima.net wrote:
> >Would I be right in thinking that 9p originally had 16 bit fids? If
> >so, it suggests that no-one has used kfs in anger for a while.
>
> how are you using the kfs? just locally?
> a plan 9 client normally re-used fids, so i'd have t
>a plan 9 client normally re-used fids,
Ah right, thank you - I see that now. I have just tried native plan9
and, of course, it works fine. I was running 9vx earlier and it
seems as if the fid increments each time.
Rod
>Would I be right in thinking that 9p originally had 16 bit fids? If
>so, it suggests that no-one has used kfs in anger for a while.
how are you using the kfs? just locally?
a plan 9 client normally re-used fids, so i'd have thought you'd need to have
>32767 active files,
which most people probab
kfs works fine for a bit and then fails with an "out of files" error.
It happens when the fid in a 9p message gets to a value greater than
32767. I think the "fid" field in struct File should be a 32-bit type
rather than a short int.
Would I be right in thinking that 9p originally had 16 bit f
