On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 5:47 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
> i apologize for the silly question, but
> my p9p-fu is quite weak.
>
> is the reason that plan 9 import is not
> part of p9p other than it was not needed?
it was not needed, and it's not nearly as useful
as the plan 9 one, since the access
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 20:47 -0500, erik quanstrom wrote:
> i apologize for the silly question, but
> my p9p-fu is quite weak.
>
> is the reason that plan 9 import is not
> part of p9p other than it was not needed?
> (of course the ssh-based import is included,
> but i believe that is something els
i apologize for the silly question, but
my p9p-fu is quite weak.
is the reason that plan 9 import is not
part of p9p other than it was not needed?
(of course the ssh-based import is included,
but i believe that is something else entirely.)
i'm not dead set on import, but i do require
authenticati
