> Too many renames; must be X source!
from output of p9p `acid -q', ran on basically any GNU software.
the offending code:
$PLAN9/src/cmd/acid/util.c:/must.be.X.source
if(renamed > 5 && !quiet) {
print("Too many renames; must be X source!\n");
--
dexen d
> On 31/01/2013 18:44, Rox 64 wrote:
>
> Anyway, I still love emacs.
> Maybe I'm too young?!
>
Too young an Acme user perhaps! ☺
(I say this as a recovering Emacs user, myself.)
--
phin
On 31/01/2013 18:44, Rox 64 wrote:
I don't see the problem. If I wanted to implement human beings, physical
laws, an universe and an operating system inside a missing text editor
inside a Lisp interpreter on a C compiler I'm pretty sure I would add 1200
options.
Anyway, I still love emacs.
May
10 years ago the gcc manual was bigger than kenc source.
take your pick. learn about a neat compiler or read the gcc manual.
brucee
On 1 February 2013 06:19, Rox 64 wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 6:39 PM, wrote:
>
>> Ah! I think I know why compile binaries with gcc are so slow. Because
>>
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 6:39 PM, wrote:
> Ah! I think I know why compile binaries with gcc are so slow. Because
> they first found the answer: GNU Public Licence. Then they said: here is
> the answer! Uh! THAT??? But answer to what? Hence now gcc embeds code to
> find the question the GPL is the
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 01:12:32PM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 07:08:16PM +0100, Rox 64 wrote:
> > >
> > > "To compile C, you must first invent the universe."
> > >
> >
> > Is the universe free as in the GNU General Multiverse License?
>
> I think it's CC-BY-ND. Still wa
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 07:08:16PM +0100, Rox 64 wrote:
> >
> > "To compile C, you must first invent the universe."
> >
>
> Is the universe free as in the GNU General Multiverse License?
I think it's CC-BY-ND. Still waiting on word from the content creator.
>
> "To compile C, you must first invent the universe."
>
Is the universe free as in the GNU General Multiverse License?
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 06:44:24PM +0100, Rox 64 wrote:
> I don't see the problem. If I wanted to implement human beings, physical
> laws, an universe and an operating system inside a missing text editor
> inside a Lisp interpreter on a C compiler I'm pretty sure I would add 1200
> options.
"To co
On 31 January 2013 17:44, Rox 64 wrote:
> If I wanted to implement human beings, physical laws, an universe and an
> operating system inside a missing text editor inside a Lisp interpreter on a
> C compiler I'm pretty sure I would add 1200 options.
That's a great summary. Thank you.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:42:39PM -0500, Matthew Veety wrote:
> I don't even know what to say to that.
>
Try: gcc --help
--
Thierry Laronde
http://www.kergis.com/
Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89 250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C
I don't see the problem. If I wanted to implement human beings, physical
laws, an universe and an operating system inside a missing text editor
inside a Lisp interpreter on a C compiler I'm pretty sure I would add 1200
options.
I don't even know what to say to that.
On Jan 30, 2013, at 23:51, erik quanstrom wrote:
> “There are over 1,200 GNU compiler options - see the documentation for
> details.
>- https://computing.llnl.gov/tutorials/bgq/
>
> - erik
>
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:51:06PM -0500, erik quanstrom wrote:
> ?There are over 1,200 GNU compiler options - see the documentation for
> details.
> - https://computing.llnl.gov/tutorials/bgq/
Unfortunately, there is still one option missing: please! do just as
told!
--
Thierry L
“There are over 1,200 GNU compiler options - see the documentation for details.
- https://computing.llnl.gov/tutorials/bgq/
- erik
15 matches
Mail list logo
