Re: [9fans] drawterm osx-x11 on x86_64

2013-11-26 Thread Mark van Atten
Same difference under qemu 1.6.1 instead of virtualbox 4.3.0. Does anyone have experiences to share? If not, then perhaps whatever the issue is on my setup is too local. Mark. On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Mark van Atten wrote: > Simply pinging the virtualbox cpu server gives, over a numbe

Re: [9fans] drawterm osx-x11 on x86_64

2013-11-25 Thread Mark van Atten
Simply pinging the virtualbox cpu server gives, over a number of tests, avg rtt around 150 µs from both osx-x11 and osx-cocoa drawterms. (Indeed, the latest push of osx-cocoa no longer gives the warning.) I hope at some point it will become clear what is the matter---perhaps, as you suggest, in m

Re: [9fans] drawterm osx-x11 on x86_64

2013-11-25 Thread Jeff Sickel
On Nov 22, 2013, at 3:18 AM, Mark van Atten wrote: > Well, I wrote `the current sources', but that was wrong: I just > checked bitbucket again and saw your commits of the last few hours. So > I pulled the updates and rebuilt. To my surprise, the phenomena remain > exactly the same. This time I g

Re: [9fans] drawterm osx-x11 on x86_64

2013-11-22 Thread Mark van Atten
Well, I wrote `the current sources', but that was wrong: I just checked bitbucket again and saw your commits of the last few hours. So I pulled the updates and rebuilt. To my surprise, the phenomena remain exactly the same. This time I got a message though: objc[3785]: Object 0x7fb261297930 of cla

Re: [9fans] drawterm osx-x11 on x86_64

2013-11-22 Thread Mark van Atten
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Jeff Sickel wrote: > Will one of you describe the flicker you speak of? I see flicker on > Linux’s drawterm X11 when resizing rio windows and other operations, > given the round trip time, though the flicker is less on fast local > networks. You are right, of co

Re: [9fans] drawterm osx-x11 on x86_64

2013-11-21 Thread Jeff Sickel
On Nov 21, 2013, at 9:03 AM, Steven Stallion wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Mark van Atten > wrote: >> For the moment, I prefer this to drawterm-cocoa because there is no >> flicker, and window borders remain intact when reshaping with B1 or >> B2. > > Ah! That drives me nuts too,

Re: [9fans] drawterm osx-x11 on x86_64

2013-11-21 Thread Jeff Sickel
On Nov 21, 2013, at 4:40 AM, Mark van Atten wrote: > For the moment, I prefer this to drawterm-cocoa because there is no > flicker, and window borders remain intact when reshaping with B1 or > B2. Ah, but with drawterm-cocoa you get proper rio resizing, which I find very useful when using multi

Re: [9fans] drawterm osx-x11 on x86_64

2013-11-21 Thread erik quanstrom
On Thu Nov 21 09:59:42 EST 2013, j...@corpus-callosum.com wrote: > > On Nov 21, 2013, at 4:40 AM, Mark van Atten wrote: > > > For the moment, I prefer this to drawterm-cocoa because there is no > > flicker, and window borders remain intact when reshaping with B1 or > > B2. > > Ah, but with draw

Re: [9fans] drawterm osx-x11 on x86_64

2013-11-21 Thread Jeff Sickel
Just don’t upgrade to 10.9 yet: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5293?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US http://xquartz.macosforge.org/landing/ You can install XQuartz and keep going, but the upgrade from earlier releases does delete X11 rather ruthlessly. -jas On Nov 21, 2013, at 9:03 AM, Steven Sta

Re: [9fans] drawterm osx-x11 on x86_64

2013-11-21 Thread Steven Stallion
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Mark van Atten wrote: > For the moment, I prefer this to drawterm-cocoa because there is no > flicker, and window borders remain intact when reshaping with B1 or > B2. Ah! That drives me nuts too, though it is nice to get proper fullscreen support. I've submitted

[9fans] drawterm osx-x11 on x86_64

2013-11-21 Thread Mark van Atten
For the record---to compile drawterm (http://code.google.com/p/drawterm/) with CONF=osx-x11 on x86_64 (in my case running 10.8.5), just add the required substitution to the makefile: Make.osx-x11 20 - arch=`uname -m|sed 's/i.86/386/;s/Power Macintosh/power/'`; \ 20 + arch=`uname -m|sed 's/i.86/38