Re: [9fans] clarification on man 9p

2009-10-03 Thread Gorka Guardiola
There is a version that is. Its source is with the library. - Curiosity sKilled the cat G. On Oct 3, 2009, at 11:26 AM, Fernan Bolando wrote: On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Russ Cox wrote: "In general, the File interface is appropriate for maintaining arbitrary file trees (as in ramfs)

Re: [9fans] clarification on man 9p

2009-10-03 Thread Fernan Bolando
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Russ Cox wrote: >> "In general, the File interface is appropriate for maintaining >> arbitrary file trees (as in ramfs). The File interface is best avoided >> when the tree structure is easily generated as necessary; this is true >> when the tree is highly structure

Re: [9fans] clarification on man 9p

2009-10-02 Thread Russ Cox
> "In general, the File interface is appropriate for maintaining > arbitrary file trees (as in ramfs). The File interface is best avoided > when the tree structure is easily generated as necessary; this is true > when the tree is highly structured (as in cdfs and nntpfs) or is > maintained elsewher

[9fans] clarification on man 9p

2009-10-02 Thread Fernan Bolando
Hi in man 9p "In general, the File interface is appropriate for maintaining arbitrary file trees (as in ramfs). The File interface is best avoided when the tree structure is easily generated as necessary; this is true when the tree is highly structured (as in cdfs and nntpfs) or is maintained els