Re: [9fans] clarification needed

2009-02-21 Thread Bruce Ellis
i did have mypube.com registered for a year ... cross between the obvious. the hosting dudes thought it was funny but wanted me to call them personally (in the US) to make sure i wasn't doing a porno site. they had all of their employees listening annd laughing. and the conclusive response was f

Re: [9fans] clarification needed

2009-02-21 Thread John Waters
I need to think/write up a command that I can name "nph" On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Andrew Simmons wrote: >> by the way, which one's kumar? >> > Kumar is the one with nice pubes. > >

Re: [9fans] clarification needed

2009-02-21 Thread Andrew Simmons
> by the way, which one's kumar? > Kumar is the one with nice pubes.

Re: [9fans] clarification needed

2009-02-21 Thread Bruce Ellis
b 21, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Akshat Kumar wrote: > I'm Kumar. > > Also, the one that isn't Harold. > ak > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: erik quanstrom > To: 9fans@9fans.net > Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 01:52:33 -0500 > Subject: Re: [9fans] cl

Re: [9fans] clarification needed

2009-02-20 Thread Akshat Kumar
I'm Kumar. Also, the one that isn't Harold. ak --- Begin Message --- > > your horrible joke gave me an idea to photochop jmk and brucee in this pic: > > > > http://gnathaniel.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/harold_and_kumar_go_to_white_castle__1_.jpg > > > > but, like so many other things plan9, i did

Re: [9fans] clarification needed

2009-02-20 Thread erik quanstrom
> > your horrible joke gave me an idea to photochop jmk and brucee in this pic: > > > > http://gnathaniel.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/harold_and_kumar_go_to_white_castle__1_.jpg > > > > but, like so many other things plan9, i didn't. so i posted to 9fans. > > Dude. I will PAY you money does

Re: [9fans] clarification needed

2009-02-20 Thread Dan Cross
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:35 AM, andrey mirtchovski wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Andrew Simmons wrote: >> Is this exchange part of the script for the forthcoming reality TV >> show "Harold and Kumar go to Murray Hill" ? > > your horrible joke gave me an idea to photochop jmk and br

Re: [9fans] clarification needed

2009-02-19 Thread Andrew Simmons
> but, like so many other things plan9, i didn't. so i posted to 9fans. > Evelyn Waugh wrote about "a senile itch to write to The Times". Perhaps posting to 9fans is a modern equivalent, at least for people of my generation.

Re: [9fans] clarification needed

2009-02-19 Thread balaji
weren't you blissfully semi retired? On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Bruce Ellis wrote: > You bet your ass. You're not playing with children here! > > No-one listens to me though. > > I should retire again. > > brucee > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:31 PM, wrote: >> Are you? Native? With wireles

Re: [9fans] clarification needed

2009-02-19 Thread andrey mirtchovski
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Andrew Simmons wrote: > Is this exchange part of the script for the forthcoming reality TV > show "Harold and Kumar go to Murray Hill" ? your horrible joke gave me an idea to photochop jmk and brucee in this pic: http://gnathaniel.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/har

Re: [9fans] clarification needed

2009-02-19 Thread Andrew Simmons
Is this exchange part of the script for the forthcoming reality TV show "Harold and Kumar go to Murray Hill" ? 2009/2/20 : > Since I have only recently come out of retirement I'd like details. > > On Thu Feb 19 00:45:28 EST 2009, bruce.el...@gmail.com wrote: >> You bet your ass. You're not playin

Re: [9fans] clarification needed

2009-02-19 Thread jmk
Since I have only recently come out of retirement I'd like details. On Thu Feb 19 00:45:28 EST 2009, bruce.el...@gmail.com wrote: > You bet your ass. You're not playing with children here! > > No-one listens to me though. > > I should retire again. > > brucee > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:31 P

Re: [9fans] clarification needed

2009-02-18 Thread Bruce Ellis
You bet your ass. You're not playing with children here! No-one listens to me though. I should retire again. brucee On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:31 PM, wrote: > Are you? Native? With wireless? > > --jim