// If the behavior is intended why not say so upfront and
// remove the BUGS section (or rename it to something else).
In Plan 9, the BUGS section is not really all about "bugs". This is
arguably unfortunate, but it's the way the system is. You might
check out
http://doc.cat-v.org/plan_9/m
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 19:55:53 EDT erik quanstrom wrote:
> On Mon Mar 11 18:56:04 EDT 2013, ba...@bitblocks.com wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:44:05 PDT Steven Stallion
> > wrote:
> > > from atof(2):
> > >
> > > BUGS
> > > Atoi, atol, and atoll accept octal and hexadecimal numbe
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 07:55:53PM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote:
> On Mon Mar 11 18:56:04 EDT 2013, ba...@bitblocks.com wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:44:05 PDT Steven Stallion
> > wrote:
> > > from atof(2):
> > >
> > > BUGS
> > > Atoi, atol, and atoll accept octal and hexadecim
On Mon Mar 11 18:56:04 EDT 2013, ba...@bitblocks.com wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:44:05 PDT Steven Stallion wrote:
> > from atof(2):
> >
> > BUGS
> > Atoi, atol, and atoll accept octal and hexadecimal numbers
> > in the style of C, contrary to the ANSI specification.
>
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:44:05 PDT Steven Stallion wrote:
> from atof(2):
>
> BUGS
> Atoi, atol, and atoll accept octal and hexadecimal numbers
> in the style of C, contrary to the ANSI specification.
This BUG is obviously very easy to fix but it hasn't been
Any good r
from atof(2):
BUGS
Atoi, atol, and atoll accept octal and hexadecimal numbers
in the style of C, contrary to the ANSI specification.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Bakul Shah wrote:
> The atol() manpage says:
>
> Atoi and atol recognize an optional string o
The atol() manpage says:
Atoi and atol recognize an optional string of tabs and
spaces, then an optional sign, then a string of decimal dig-
its.
And yet atol(x) acts exactly like strol(x, nil, 0). This makes
it unnecessarily incompatible with the unix version. Ditt
