Re: [9fans] arm fun

2014-05-13 Thread Erik Quanstrom
the lock is in the bss. maybe the wrong page gets accessed after fork. Charles Forsyth wrote: >I've got one of those that was fine last time I tried it. I'll try it in the >morning. > >I wonder whether the change of lock to use semacquire instead of tas doesn't >work well on the (that) ARM. >

Re: [9fans] arm fun

2014-05-13 Thread Charles Forsyth
I've got one of those that was fine last time I tried it. I'll try it in the morning. I wonder whether the change of lock to use semacquire instead of tas doesn't work well on the (that) ARM. It seems a strange coincidence that it always fails there.

Re: [9fans] arm fun

2014-05-13 Thread erik quanstrom
> When I’d try and kill it, there’d be a likely chance that rc > would also get the same Semacquire deadlock. This can also be seen > using broke to try and prune dead dns processes: > > dream% acid 158 > /proc/158/text:arm plan 9 executable > /sys/lib/acid/port > /sys/lib

[9fans] arm fun

2014-05-13 Thread Jeff Sickel
I may be one of the few with a still surviving Kirkwood dreamplugs, though that could be tentative as who knows how long the hardware will last. After the thing was running relatively well for a long period of time, I finally got around to changing some http settings, rebuilt userland, and prepare