Hyper-V is negative for 2008r2.
Joel C. Salomon wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Federico G. Benavento
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Joel C. Salomon wrote:
My computer died, so I'm in the market for a new one. I figure I'd
like to get back into hacking on Plan 9 so I plan to install it
beneath a VM
On 16 Apr 2010, at 18:48, Patrick Kelly wrote:
The only emulator you're spending time on is Qemu, the rest are
virtualizers or simulators, and there is a significant difference.
Emulators are much slower, because of what they have to do.
Qemu is capable of full emulation, but when host & gue
This afternoon I downloaded a trial version of VM Fusion (Version
3.0.2 (232708)) and a fresh plan9.iso.bz2 and installed it on my core
2 due macbook running OS X Leopard (Version 10.5.8).
It works quite nicely, graphics and networking are both working. The
only things that tripped me up were I ha
> >
> > The only emulator you're spending time on is Qemu, the rest are
> > virtualizers or simulators, and there is a significant difference.
> > Emulators are much slower, because of what they have to do.
>
> Qemu is capable of full emulation, but when host & guest architecture match
> (or are
On 16 Apr 2010, at 17:40, Patrick Kelly wrote:
From: 9fans-boun...@9fans.net [mailto:9fans-boun...@9fans.net] On
Behalf Of Rodolfo (kix)
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 2:20 AM
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
Subject: Re: [9fans] Recommended emulators/VMs for P9 install
I am agreed
> -Original Message-
> From: 9fans-boun...@9fans.net [mailto:9fans-boun...@9fans.net] On Behalf Of
> Joel C. Salomon
> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 10:51 AM
> To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
> Subject: Re: [9fans] Recommended emulators/VMs for P9 install
>
&
>From: 9fans-boun...@9fans.net [mailto:9fans-boun...@9fans.net] On Behalf Of
>Rodolfo (kix)
>Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 2:20 AM
>To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
>Subject: Re: [9fans] Recommended emulators/VMs for P9 install
>
>I am agreed with Federico,
>vmware
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Federico G. Benavento
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Joel C. Salomon
> wrote:
>> My computer died, so I'm in the market for a new one. I figure I'd
>> like to get back into hacking on Plan 9 so I plan to install it
>> beneath a VM in whatever machine
I am agreed with Federico,
vmware. Do not spend time with other emulators.
El 15 de abr de 2010, 9:02 p.m., "Federico G. Benavento" <
benave...@gmail.com> escribió:
vmware, the rest just suck, qemu and virtual box being
the slowest
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Joel C. Salomon
wrote: > My
> There are probably better file server configurations,
> but essentially I don't really trust fossil from a performance
> or stability standpoint.
it's curious that fossil is typically considered the only choice.
what about ...
- kfs
- cwfs
- ken's fs in another vm.
- erik
ymmv, but here are two configurations I use:
VMware fusion on Mac -- but only to run cpu/fs/auth -- I use either drawterm or
ACME-sac to get into it. It is very snappy. Easily as snappy (for me) as my
standalone Plan 9 equivalent and I do basically all my work in this
environment. I do not r
Hello erik,
Thursday, April 15, 2010, 8:44:08 PM, you wrote:
>> main issue is interrupt count does not go below 4000. . .need to dig more
>> into this, probably to compose a mail to the list :), but it does not hurt
>> too much, at least for now.
> that shouldn't be happening unless you're doi
On Thu Apr 15 14:57:21 EDT 2010, benave...@gmail.com wrote:
> vmware, the rest just suck, qemu and virtual box being
> the slowest
there are relatively easy things we could do to make virtual box better,
but as it doesn't run well on linux, it's hard to find the motivation.
- erik
vmware, the rest just suck, qemu and virtual box being
the slowest
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Joel C. Salomon wrote:
> My computer died, so I'm in the market for a new one. I figure I'd
> like to get back into hacking on Plan 9 so I plan to install it
> beneath a VM in whatever machine I b
i would think that 9vx is the logical choice for linux. the free
vmware player works well on vista and win7. i used qemu
for a while and it seemed stable and usable.
> My computer died, so I'm in the market for a new one. I figure I'd
> like to get back into hacking on Plan 9 so I plan to instal
> main issue is interrupt count does not go below 4000. . .need to dig more
> into this, probably to compose a mail to the list :), but it does not hurt
> too much, at least for now.
that shouldn't be happening unless you're doing a lot of disk/network
io.
if you're using 9atom, one would expec
es not hurt too much,
at least for now.
slds.
gabi
- Original Message
From: Joel C. Salomon
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Sent: Thu, April 15, 2010 7:11:49 PM
Subject: [9fans] Recommended emulators/VMs for P9 install
My computer died, so I'm i
My computer died, so I'm in the market for a new one. I figure I'd
like to get back into hacking on Plan 9 so I plan to install it
beneath a VM in whatever machine I buy. I'm even considering Windows
7 Pro with Virtual PC, but I think I'd prefer Xen or one of the
Linux-based things (VirtualBox, e
19 matches
Mail list logo
