/n/sources/xen/xen3 is now updated (source and pre-built kernels) to
be compatible with Xen 3.2 - tested (thanks to Alex and Andreas) with:
Xen 3.2.1 (debian package xen-linux-system-2.6.26-2-xen-686)
XenServer 5.5
It also still boots on Xen 3.0.2.
I have to retract my remarks about Xen API
> Now I may be way off here, but I though that perhaps the tab character
> in front of
> VIRT_BASE here may cause it to not be recognized by xenelf. I joined
> it into one line,
> and I am rewarded with a different error message:
>
> "xc_dom_alloc_segment: segment start isn't page aligned".
S
Now I may be way off here, but I though that perhaps the tab
character
in front of
VIRT_BASE here may cause it to not be recognized by xenelf. I joined
it into one line,
and I am rewarded with a different error message:
"xc_dom_alloc_segment: segment start isn't page aligned".
I really don't k
> Now I may be way off here, but I though that perhaps the tab character
> in front of
> VIRT_BASE here may cause it to not be recognized by xenelf. I joined
> it into one line,
> and I am rewarded with a different error message:
>
> "xc_dom_alloc_segment: segment start isn't page aligned".
>
The kernel did not compile against the most recent sources.
I've fixed this so it compiles again with current kernel source.
Haven't tried booting it on anything, though.
I successfully compiled against Xen 3.4.1 and tried to boot it on
XenServer 5.0r3, but unfortunately it failed with roug
> The kernel did not compile against the most recent sources.
I've fixed this so it compiles again with current kernel source.
Haven't tried booting it on anything, though.
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Jack Norton wrote:
> I would like to know if the fellow below (Andreas Erikson), ever tried to
> compile plan 9 xen3 sources against xen 3.2.x (or 3.[2-4].x for that
> matter). I am going to try that this weekend, and if he started to patch
> some code, I would ap
I tried, but it was beyond my limited time and understanding. I hope
you succeed. I am using Xen (specifically, Citrix XenServer) in a
project I am working on now, and would very much like to run Plan 9 as
a part of that.
Good luck!
–Andreas
On 2. Oct, 2009, at 3:21 PM, Jack Norton wrote:
Hello,
I would like to know if the fellow below (Andreas Erikson), ever tried
to compile plan 9 xen3 sources against xen 3.2.x (or 3.[2-4].x for that
matter). I am going to try that this weekend, and if he started to
patch some code, I would appreciate the head start.
>From: Richard Mille
