On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:46:31 EDT erik quanstrom wrote:
> > Anyway, a couple of areas to look into, if you want plan9 on
> > vbox: try changing the memory layout of plan9 or figure out
> > what qemu did to make plan9 run well and apply that change to
> > vbox.
>
> what makes you think its a memor
> Anyway, a couple of areas to look into, if you want plan9 on
> vbox: try changing the memory layout of plan9 or figure out
> what qemu did to make plan9 run well and apply that change to
> vbox.
what makes you think its a memory layout issue?
- erik
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 08:25:53 PDT David Leimbach wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Bakul Shah
>
> > wrote:
...
> > I think vbox devices and recompiler are based on qemu but I
> > don't really know. IIRC early qemu did seem to have similar
> > issues with plan9.
> >
> > Since ot
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Daniel Lyons wrote:
> I don't know how to obtain this information, but would be glad to supply it.
> Also, forgive my ignorance, but isn't there a chicken-and-egg problem, since
> if the MTRRs are set up in vgavesa.c, my display is unusable? Or is there a
> special
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Bakul Shah
> wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 05:47:25 PDT David Leimbach
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Bakul Shah
> > <
> bakul%2bpl...@bitblocks.com >
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:12:08 PDT David Leimbach
> > > wrote:
> > > >
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 05:47:25 PDT David Leimbach wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Bakul Shah
>
> > wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:12:08 PDT David Leimbach
> > wrote:
> > > Wow Where's parallels 4. I doubt I qualify for a free one. And
> > VMWare
> > > Fusion really suck
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Bakul Shah
> wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:12:08 PDT David Leimbach
> wrote:
> > Wow Where's parallels 4. I doubt I qualify for a free one. And
> VMWare
> > Fusion really sucks with Plan 9 at the moment :-(
>
> qemu works well enough for me on FreeBSD &
> I fear I may not have applied the patch correctly:
>
> /sys/src/9/pc% mk CONF=pcf
> 8c -FTVw devarch.c
> devarch.c:733 not enough function arguments: cpuid
> devarch.c:733 argument prototype mismatch "IND ULONG" for "IND INT":
> cpuid
> devarch.c:739 argument prototype mismatch "INT" for "IND
On Aug 3, 2009, at 5:20 AM, erik quanstrom wrote:
strange.
could one of you having trouble with vesa + mtrr try
vesa + the pat patch on sources in the saved patch
directory?
I fear I may not have applied the patch correctly:
/sys/src/9/pc% mk CONF=pcf
8c -FTVw devarch.c
devarch.c:733 not en
On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:12:08 PDT David Leimbach wrote:
> Wow Where's parallels 4. I doubt I qualify for a free one. And VMWare
> Fusion really sucks with Plan 9 at the moment :-(
qemu works well enough for me on FreeBSD & Linux but not on a
Mac. VirtualBox doesn't run plan9 but it runs F
On Aug 3, 2009, at 9:12 PM, David Leimbach wrote:
Wow Where's parallels 4. I doubt I qualify for a free one.
And VMWare Fusion really sucks with Plan 9 at the moment :-(
You could always try Q: http://www.kju-app.org/. I find it unbearably
slow but it is free. I thought VirtualBox
On Aug 3, 2009, at 10:30 AM, ron minnich wrote:
Given these systems with mtrr issues.
Would it be possible to get:
- output from pci so we can see what memory ranges are in use on
your machine
0.2.0: vid 03.00.00 1ab8/1131 11 0:4001 256 1:c000 16777216
2:4401 16
0.3.0: br
Wow Where's parallels 4. I doubt I qualify for a free one. And VMWare
Fusion really sucks with Plan 9 at the moment :-(
Dave
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 7:36 PM, wrote:
> Plan 9, including vga, runs fine in Parallels 4.
>
> The new vesa driver will only use mtrrs if the cpuid
> instruction say
Plan 9, including vga, runs fine in Parallels 4.
The new vesa driver will only use mtrrs if the cpuid
instruction says that they exist.
Given these systems with mtrr issues.
Would it be possible to get:
- output from pci so we can see what memory ranges are in use on your machine
- how much memory
- what the mtrrs look like once set up
ron
On Mon Aug 3 05:27:06 EDT 2009, 9f...@hamnavoe.com wrote:
> > Hopefully I'll be able to afford a copy of the new
> > version of Parallels in a little while and perhaps that will help
> > further isolate the problem.
>
> It's not just Parallels. The new vgavesa also fails to work on
> my VIA
> Hopefully I'll be able to afford a copy of the new
> version of Parallels in a little while and perhaps that will help
> further isolate the problem.
It's not just Parallels. The new vgavesa also fails to work on
my VIA Epia MS1 motherboard - even with the "vesaflush" table
entry remove
On 08/02/2009 03:10 PM, Daniel Lyons wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed Plan 9 under Parallels 3 back in November of last year and
> it worked without a hitch. I tried to install another copy tonight and
> the bitmapped display isn't working in the new one, I just get a pure
> black screen after any aux
On Aug 2, 2009, at 3:41 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
Erik,
Thanks for your speedy assistance! I think the two things are closely
interrrelated via the global variable hardscreen. Reverting this file
solved the problem. I wouldn't be surprised if there were something
weird about Parallels' MTRR su
> Erik,
>
> Thanks for your speedy assistance! I think the two things are closely
> interrrelated via the global variable hardscreen. Reverting this file
> solved the problem. I wouldn't be surprised if there were something
> weird about Parallels' MTRR support, and since this isn't the curr
> Also, are the old sources available online somewhere so I can do this
> kind of diff in the future on my own?
you can use history(1) and yesterday(1) against sources.
9fs sources
history -D sourcesdump /n/sources/plan9/sys/src/9/pc/vgavesa.c
-Steve
Erik,
Thanks for your speedy assistance! I think the two things are closely
interrrelated via the global variable hardscreen. Reverting this file
solved the problem. I wouldn't be surprised if there were something
weird about Parallels' MTRR support, and since this isn't the current
versi
On Sun Aug 2 05:39:10 EDT 2009, fus...@storytotell.org wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed Plan 9 under Parallels 3 back in November of last year and
> it worked without a hitch. I tried to install another copy tonight and
> the bitmapped display isn't working in the new one, I just get a pure
> b
Hi,
I installed Plan 9 under Parallels 3 back in November of last year and
it worked without a hitch. I tried to install another copy tonight and
the bitmapped display isn't working in the new one, I just get a pure
black screen after any aux/vga command that it thinks will succeed. I
fou
24 matches
Mail list logo
