It seems to me that this type of operation would be considerably more
successful if there was better interaction between the kernel and a
running program. that is, if processes were engineered to accept
unsolicited signalling from the kernel and, consequently, from other
processes without being re
There was a proc box in the original Plan B of which there were different
version in the descendants (for files too) and
which permitted things similar to what you want. See
http://lsub.org/ls/export/man.1e.ps (page 31)
and
http://lsub.org/ls/export/ubiterm.icps05.pdf
Later, Andrey and Ron did so
On Mon May 5 10:40:18 EDT 2014, yshu...@lynxline.com wrote:
> On 05/05/2014 03:06 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
> > nemo's kernels
>
> What is the nemo kernel? by the way
i used that as a term of art to avoid the fact i messed up by not changing
the name of nix, which in 9atom is quite different, n
On 05/05/2014 03:06 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
> nemo's kernels
What is the nemo kernel? by the way
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
> the system calls that are not currently in the name space are those
> that do not distribute (and there have been a few things in the name
> space that don't distribute and are troublesome).
>
> segbrk doesn't distribute. rfork doesn't distribute. you can have a
> control request in a name spa
On 5 May 2014 13:09, erik quanstrom wrote:
> that has system call namespaces.
the system calls that are not currently in the name space are those that do
not distribute
(and there have been a few things in the name space that don't distribute
and are troublesome).
segbrk doesn't distribute. rf
> On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 08:53:39PM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote:
> >
> > On Sun May 4 18:01:22 EDT 2014, yshu...@lynxline.com wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Just idea, but seriously, why cannot do something like this:
> > >
> > > # cat /prog/new > $id
> > > # cat /dis/ls.dis > /prog/$id/dis
> > > # e
On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 08:53:39PM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote:
>
> On Sun May 4 18:01:22 EDT 2014, yshu...@lynxline.com wrote:
>
> >
> > Just idea, but seriously, why cannot do something like this:
> >
> > # cat /prog/new > $id
> > # cat /dis/ls.dis > /prog/$id/dis
> > # echo "/" > /prog/$id/
On Sun May 4 18:01:22 EDT 2014, yshu...@lynxline.com wrote:
>
> Just idea, but seriously, why cannot do something like this:
>
> # cat /prog/new > $id
> # cat /dis/ls.dis > /prog/$id/dis
> # echo "/" > /prog/$id/cwd
> # echo «Running» > /prog/$id/status
>
> Not to do it which echo/cat, but to
Just idea, but seriously, why cannot do something like this:
# cat /prog/new > $id
# cat /dis/ls.dis > /prog/$id/dis
# echo "/" > /prog/$id/cwd
# echo «Running» > /prog/$id/status
Not to do it which echo/cat, but to have remote access to /prog/new
10 matches
Mail list logo
