On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 2:19 PM, EBo wrote:
>
>> > These new flint arrowheads are state of the art! I always use them for
>> > HPC with my MPI code!
>>
>> With some ancient Fortran sprinkled in? :-)
>
> Now were were those Jacquard loom plates I had sitting around?
Under the pile of Hollerith car
> > These new flint arrowheads are state of the art! I always use them for
> > HPC with my MPI code!
>
> With some ancient Fortran sprinkled in? :-)
Now were were those Jacquard loom plates I had sitting around? Are we done
with out multi-tread processing testing? You know that was a real war
well damn
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:19 PM, maht wrote:
> On 01/04/2010 17:01, Corey Thomasson wrote:
>>
>> But OTOH, who's still making SOTA VHS players (ignoring the VHS/DVD
>> combos and VHS->USB thingies)
>>
>
> Search for : LG MG64 VHS VCR
>
>
>
>
On 01/04/2010 17:01, Corey Thomasson wrote:
But OTOH, who's still making SOTA VHS players (ignoring the VHS/DVD
combos and VHS->USB thingies)
Search for : LG MG64 VHS VCR
But OTOH, who's still making SOTA VHS players (ignoring the VHS/DVD
combos and VHS->USB thingies)
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Jeff Sickel wrote:
> Sometimes SOTA just has staying power. Even now, in the days of the
> streaming audio and video technologies, businesses making state of the ar
Sometimes SOTA just has staying power. Even now, in the days of the streaming
audio and video technologies, businesses making state of the art turntables for
whats that? LPs (isn't that stone-age tech?)... continue to release new
products.
-jas
On Mar 31, 2010, at 6:02 PM, ron minnich wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 4:02 PM, ron minnich wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:51 PM, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > Ron, when has plan9 stopped being state of the art?
>
> Remember, "the state of the are" does not mean "good".
>
> These new flint arrowheads are state of the art! I a
> I must admit that, in general, physicist, astrophysicists and
> astronomers are very bad programmers. I've worked with all those
> breeds and we really suck.
referring to we, I take it you are one of them.
> Maybe the fact that I've read, and solved
> almost all the exercises from "the pract
2010/3/31 EBo :
> Other than that, you might want to download some of the models which use MPI
> and possibly play with them. Depending on the size of the codebase this might
> scare you off a bit, but I actually find playing with the GCM WRF and RegCM3
> rather enlightening once I got past the in
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:51 PM, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Ron, when has plan9 stopped being state of the art?
Remember, "the state of the are" does not mean "good".
These new flint arrowheads are state of the art! I always use them for
HPC with my MPI code!
:-)
ron
All right ;)
Ron, when has plan9 stopped being state of the art?
> > wrong list
>
> Wrong answer... He was also asking about any libraries or technologies that
> Plan 9 might have, no one has answered that part of the question yet as far
> as I know.
ahhh... I missed that. I do not have all my lit integrated into bibtex yet,
so here are some URL's and citatio
there was a proof-of-concept implementation of MPI for Plan 9 at LANL
which relied on primitives specific to the OS in order to implement
the communication (mounted remote file servers and namespaces). The
cool thing about it was that it allowed one to write MPI programs
using shell scripts. The fu
Wrong answer... He was also asking about any libraries or technologies that
Plan 9 might have, no one has answered that part of the question yet as far
as I know.
Dave
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:37 AM, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> wrong list
>
>
wrong list
> I'm about to start a course that goes by the title of "Computational
> Physics", and as I was having a look at the items that we are going to
> cover, and saw that there's an "Introduction to parallel computing and
> parallel programming with Message Passing Interface (MPI)". Some of
> you 9fan
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 16:57 +0200, hugo rivera wrote:
> I'm about to start a course that goes by the title of "Computational
> Physics", and as I was having a look at the items that we are going to
> cover, and saw that there's an "Introduction to parallel computing and
> parallel programming with
If you want to know the current state of the art at the high end you
need to understand MPI.
It's not great, in fact it's awful, but it does the job for now.
ron
Hi,
I'm about to start a course that goes by the title of "Computational
Physics", and as I was having a look at the items that we are going to
cover, and saw that there's an "Introduction to parallel computing and
parallel programming with Message Passing Interface (MPI)". Some of
you 9fans may be
19 matches
Mail list logo
