in the news:
http://www.regdeveloper.co.uk/2008/03/27/google_summer_code_debian_losers/
> I can see the attractiveness in one sense. I'd like to have
> an (e.g.) git file system such that to compare trees I did not type
> all these commands I can't remember
That's mostly all it...
I also thought about commiting by copying the working directory to the
virtual directory "store". But
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 6:54 AM, hiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What's the big win here?
> There is no *big* win. It would be of good use for me.
I can see the attractiveness in one sense. I'd like to have
an (e.g.) git file system such that to compare trees I did not type
all these commands
> What's the big win here?
There is no *big* win. It would be of good use for me.
--
hiro
The GFDL governs documentation. It tries to keep your manuals free-as-
in-freedom. :-) Look at the absolute bottom of any page on Wikipedia.
On Mar 19, 2008, at 3:19 AM, Andrew Simmons wrote:
interested students should perhaps submit their plan 9 gsoc project
proposals to the Hurd. i hear we h
>interested students should perhaps submit their plan 9 gsoc project
>proposals to the Hurd. i hear we have a connection there through a
>certain Thomas Bushnell, BSG ;)
Bushnell is no longer associated with the Hurd . Ironically, he
appears to have been sacked by Stallman after a licensing disput
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 3:56 PM, hiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> serious, there are still enaugh organizations, which could need a
> filesystem interface. a hgfs (mercurial) would be nice.
What's the big win here?
ron
On 3/18/08, andrey mirtchovski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> interested students should perhaps submit their plan 9 gsoc project
> proposals to the Hurd. i hear we have a connection there through a
> certain Thomas Bushnell, BSG ;)
serious, there are still enaugh organizations, which could need a
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 1:52 PM, ron minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Iruata Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > last year's big problem was the number of failed projects, not the
> > effort made by the organization.
>
> I am going to assume you know thi
interested students should perhaps submit their plan 9 gsoc project
proposals to the Hurd. i hear we have a connection there through a
certain Thomas Bushnell, BSG ;)
> The required introspection is about how we function as an open source
> community, I suspect.
This, i regard rather suspiciously.
> We don't fit the usual open source mold, and generally cooperate
> quite poorly with one another (with some notable exceptions).
> Our projects aren't particul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The required introspection is about how we function as an open source
community, I suspect.
We don't fit the usual open source mold, and generally cooperate
quite poorly with one another (with some notable exceptions).
Our projects aren't particul
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Iruata Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> last year's big problem was the number of failed projects, not the
> effort made by the organization.
I am going to assume you know this because you know the % of failed
projects for Plan 9, you know the % failed for all
> last year's big problem was the number of failed projects, not the
> effort made by the organization.
that, by definition, is an organizational problem.
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Skip Tavakkolian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> perhaps a little introspection is needed. was it that they didn't like
> the proposals this year or that they didn't like the outcome of last
> year's effort?
>
> or maybe they just want to spread their love.
>
las
perhaps a little introspection is needed. was it that they didn't like
the proposals this year or that they didn't like the outcome of last
year's effort?
or maybe they just want to spread their love.
> They took GNU Hurd, but not plan9? Terrorists!
>
>> Since we didn't hear back, and our name
Perhaps, just because GNU Hurd still needs too much work to put it
daily workable, while plan9 has already been :-)
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:06 PM, hiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> They took GNU Hurd, but not plan9? Terrorists!
>
>
>
> On 3/18/08, Dave Eckhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
They took GNU Hurd, but not plan9? Terrorists!
On 3/18/08, Dave Eckhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since we didn't hear back, and our name is not on the list
> of accepted projects, it appears that Google rejected our
> application.
>
> Of course we'll try to figure out why and how we can do
Since we didn't hear back, and our name is not on the list
of accepted projects, it appears that Google rejected our
application.
Of course we'll try to figure out why and how we can do
better next year.
Dave Eckhardt
19 matches
Mail list logo
