Re: [9fans] Issues with 2 networks, fs server, and namespaces

2009-08-21 Thread Devon H. O'Dell
2009/8/21 erik quanstrom : > On Fri Aug 21 19:55:55 EDT 2009, devon.od...@gmail.com wrote: >> Well, we're getting somewhere. Using /cfg/cpu/namespace still seems to >> do nothing to get ether1 into /net. Putting it into cpurc does the >> trick though, go figure. > > you need it in both places, as n

Re: [9fans] Issues with 2 networks, fs server, and namespaces

2009-08-21 Thread erik quanstrom
> I'm trying to set up a group of servers (these are running on VMWare > ESXi, and working great -- CPU server running with two APs, though > adding more causes it to fault with a divide by zero?). Auth server's could you be more specific about this? > The FS, however, sits on a private network.

Re: [9fans] Issues with 2 networks, fs server, and namespaces

2009-08-21 Thread erik quanstrom
> Of course, I'm now faced with another new issue. auth/debug looks like > it just tries to debug factotum keys. This machine has an interface on > 9vx.org and another on int.9vx.org. However, auth/debug only tries to > debug 9vx.org, leading me to believe that factotum has no key for > int.9vx.org

Re: [9fans] Issues with 2 networks, fs server, and namespaces

2009-08-21 Thread erik quanstrom
On Fri Aug 21 19:55:55 EDT 2009, devon.od...@gmail.com wrote: > Well, we're getting somewhere. Using /cfg/cpu/namespace still seems to > do nothing to get ether1 into /net. Putting it into cpurc does the > trick though, go figure. you need it in both places, as namespace doesn't apply to the conso

Re: [9fans] Issues with 2 networks, fs server, and namespaces

2009-08-21 Thread erik quanstrom
> mount: auth_proxy: auth_proxy rpc write: p9...@int.9vx.org: no key > matches proto=p9sk1 dom=int.9vx.org role=client user? !password? > mount: mount /n/fs: fossil authCheck: auth protocol not finished that sounds like you are cpu'd into a machine and /mnt/factotum is the hostowner's factotum, t

Re: [9fans] Issues with 2 networks, fs server, and namespaces

2009-08-21 Thread Devon H. O'Dell
And that's taken care of. Didn't have an authdom configured in /lib/ndb/local, and for some reason, I forgot to set up keyfs on the auth server. Thought I had that taken care of. Of course, I'm now faced with another new issue. auth/debug looks like it just tries to debug factotum keys. This machi

Re: [9fans] Issues with 2 networks, fs server, and namespaces

2009-08-21 Thread Devon H. O'Dell
Well, we're getting somewhere. Using /cfg/cpu/namespace still seems to do nothing to get ether1 into /net. Putting it into cpurc does the trick though, go figure. However, I've got a new issue. When I go to mount the file server, I'm getting this: mount: auth_proxy: auth_proxy rpc write: p9...@in

Re: [9fans] Issues with 2 networks, fs server, and namespaces

2009-08-21 Thread Devon H. O'Dell
2009/8/21 Noah Evans : > Hey Devon, > > 1. Others know more about that than I do. Wait a bit, that problem > might get solved. I think I brought that up because if anybody has ideas about fixing them or making them better, I would like to do that. > 2. drawterm tends to hang on secstore for me. T

Re: [9fans] Issues with 2 networks, fs server, and namespaces

2009-08-21 Thread Christopher Nielsen
Certainly. No problem. Yes, just bind #l1 to /net, assign it an IP addr on that private network, and put a route in the routing table for good measure. Though that last step may not be entirely necessary. -Chris On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 14:59, Devon H. O'Dell wrote: > 2009/8/21 Devon H. O'Dell :

Re: [9fans] Issues with 2 networks, fs server, and namespaces

2009-08-21 Thread Noah Evans
Hey Devon, 1. Others know more about that than I do. Wait a bit, that problem might get solved. 2. drawterm tends to hang on secstore for me. Try a bogus -s option or use a p9p secstore/factotum and see what happens. 3. what's stopping you from setting up your external network as the one on /net.a

Re: [9fans] Issues with 2 networks, fs server, and namespaces

2009-08-21 Thread Devon H. O'Dell
2009/8/21 Christopher Nielsen : > You don't need a second IP stack. You can run both interfaces on the > same IP stack and routing will just work. That's how I did it when I > had a similar setup. I do need a second IP stack because the other network is on another switch on the other interface, an

Re: [9fans] Issues with 2 networks, fs server, and namespaces

2009-08-21 Thread Devon H. O'Dell
2009/8/21 Devon H. O'Dell : > 2009/8/21 Christopher Nielsen : >> You don't need a second IP stack. You can run both interfaces on the >> same IP stack and routing will just work. That's how I did it when I >> had a similar setup. Wait, I misread your explanation. Would you care to explain more abo

Re: [9fans] Issues with 2 networks, fs server, and namespaces

2009-08-21 Thread Christopher Nielsen
You don't need a second IP stack. You can run both interfaces on the same IP stack and routing will just work. That's how I did it when I had a similar setup. -Chris On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 14:07, Devon H. O'Dell wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm trying to set up a group of servers (these are running o

[9fans] Issues with 2 networks, fs server, and namespaces

2009-08-21 Thread Devon H. O'Dell
Hello all, I'm trying to set up a group of servers (these are running on VMWare ESXi, and working great -- CPU server running with two APs, though adding more causes it to fault with a divide by zero?). Auth server's got its own 1GB fossil, boots with the 9pcauth kernel. CPU server boots from a sm