Re: [9fans] EWOULDBLOCK in APE

2008-03-21 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
On Mar 21, 2008, at 12:07 AM, Skip Tavakkolian wrote: a couple of weeks ago brucee and i were looking for "wood block" on linux :) here's a little torture: which header file has the errno's on linux? On the contrary: none of them, because if SCO doesn't realize that once they release Unix a

Re: [9fans] EWOULDBLOCK in APE

2008-03-20 Thread ron minnich
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Skip Tavakkolian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > a couple of weeks ago brucee and i were looking for "wood block" on linux :) > > here's a little torture: which header file has the errno's on linux? All of them. ron

Re: [9fans] EWOULDBLOCK in APE

2008-03-20 Thread Bruce Ellis
well to be honest i did use up more than my share of wood blocks ... but my fire was raging. in the early 80s when a thousand new errnos were introduced it was a cocktail afternoon at basser, and i think it was andrew taylor who looked at ENAMELON and exclaimed "And A Melon?" ... so i made melon da

Re: [9fans] EWOULDBLOCK in APE

2008-03-20 Thread Skip Tavakkolian
a couple of weeks ago brucee and i were looking for "wood block" on linux :) here's a little torture: which header file has the errno's on linux? On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Federico G. Benavento <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think it's common on UNIX systems for EWOULDBLOCK to be a syn

Re: [9fans] EWOULDBLOCK in APE

2008-03-20 Thread Federico G. Benavento
> I think it's common on UNIX systems for EWOULDBLOCK to be a synonym for > EAGAIN. that's correct, at least acording to my POSIX man pages I have in the posix-man contrib package. -- Federico G. Benavento

[9fans] EWOULDBLOCK in APE

2008-03-20 Thread lucio
I'm seeking advice. APE does not include EWOULDBLOCK in its . I have a feeling that no syscall will return EWOULDBLOCK as an error code, so I fail to see any reason not to include it. Am I missing something? ++L

Re: [9fans] EWOULDBLOCK in APE

2008-03-20 Thread Richard Bilson
> APE does not include EWOULDBLOCK in its . I have a feeling > that no syscall will return EWOULDBLOCK as an error code, so I fail to > see any reason not to include it. Am I missing something? I think it's common on UNIX systems for EWOULDBLOCK to be a synonym for EAGAIN.

Re: [9fans] EWOULDBLOCK in APE

2008-03-20 Thread ron minnich
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:48 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > APE does not include EWOULDBLOCK in its . I have a feeling > that no syscall will return EWOULDBLOCK as an error code, so I fail to > see any reason not to include it. Am I missing something? If it's not there, and someone uses