Re: [9fans] dns problem with plan9.iso downloaded on Tue07Feb2012_2219

2012-02-17 Thread erik quanstrom
> Thank you. Managed to ping 8.8.8.8 and had to recompile ping after > modifying nrand.c as per my earlier bug find > on Mar 9 2009, 9:38 am > [ > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.plan9/browse_thread/thread/ac738207e85e04eb/b378c7677969d241?lnk=gst&q=ping++suicide%3A+sys%3A+trap%3A+divide+err

Re: [9fans] dns problem with plan9.iso downloaded on Tue07Feb2012_2219

2012-02-17 Thread ROuNIN
Hello all, Thank you. Managed to ping 8.8.8.8 and had to recompile ping after modifying nrand.c as per my earlier bug find on Mar 9 2009, 9:38 am [ http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.plan9/browse_thread/thread/ac738207e85e04eb/b378c7677969d241?lnk=gst&q=ping++suicide%3A+sys%3A+trap%3A+divide+er

Re: [9fans] dns problem with plan9.iso downloaded on Tue07Feb2012_2219

2012-02-13 Thread erik quanstrom
> term% ip/ping -fr 192.168.0.12 192.168.0.12 is not a routable address, so one onders if you can actually route out of your local segment. try 8.8.8.8. > It used to work before - what happened? > Have I missed something? > ROuNIN "dns failure" usually means that a dns message came back in resp

Re: [9fans] dns problem with plan9.iso downloaded on Tue07Feb2012_2219

2012-02-13 Thread Sergey Zhilkin
is ndb/cs running ? stat /srv/cs 2012/2/13 ROuNIN > Hello > Using this new version and creating a new Plan9 install with the > following: > > md5sum /home/plan9/plan9.Tue07Feb2012_2219.iso > a62dba17efa51e3c5dbd1b12e8586492 /home/plan9/ > plan9.Tue07Feb2012_2219.iso > > I see the following: > >

[9fans] dns problem with plan9.iso downloaded on Tue07Feb2012_2219

2012-02-13 Thread ROuNIN
Hello Using this new version and creating a new Plan9 install with the following: md5sum /home/plan9/plan9.Tue07Feb2012_2219.iso a62dba17efa51e3c5dbd1b12e8586492 /home/plan9/ plan9.Tue07Feb2012_2219.iso I see the following: term% ip/ipconfig term% ndb/dns -r term% ip/ping www.google.com ip/ping

Re: [9fans] DNS problem

2010-11-23 Thread erik quanstrom
On Tue Nov 23 12:33:37 EST 2010, pavel.klinkov...@gmail.com wrote: > > i can't replicate this now.  not saying you don't have > > a problem, just that i can't replicate this right now. > Interesting. > Some mistake in my NDB configuration? i think it's a real data-dependent bug in dns, not a conf

Re: [9fans] DNS problem

2010-11-23 Thread Pavel Klinkovsky
On 23 lis, 10:48, Pavel Klinkovsky wrote: >         dns.ar(ip name=xmpp-server2.l.google.com ttl00) >         dns.ar(ip name=xmpp-server3.l.google.com ttl00) > Interesting, I checked the 'status' after the 'snoopy' failure: snoopy 28077: Killed: Insufficient physical memory Pavel

Re: [9fans] DNS problem

2010-11-23 Thread Pavel Klinkovsky
> i can't replicate this now.  not saying you don't have > a problem, just that i can't replicate this right now. Interesting. Some mistake in my NDB configuration? Pavel

Re: [9fans] DNS problem

2010-11-23 Thread erik quanstrom
> I am using Plan9 server as my home server (ip=192.168.15.20) > controlling DNS names in my LAN and relaying other requests to the > public DNS server (ip=88.146.135.10). > Up to now everything worked fine. i can't replicate this now. not saying you don't have a problem, just that i can't replic

Re: [9fans] DNS problem

2010-11-23 Thread Sergey Zhilkin
Hi ! Seems like that is an old google dns issue, look at http://9fans.net/archive/2008/10/37 On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Pavel Klinkovsky wrote: > > Hi all, > > I am using Plan9 server as my home server (ip=192.168.15.20) > controlling DNS names in my LAN and relaying other requests to the

[9fans] DNS problem

2010-11-23 Thread Pavel Klinkovsky
Hi all, I am using Plan9 server as my home server (ip=192.168.15.20) controlling DNS names in my LAN and relaying other requests to the public DNS server (ip=88.146.135.10). Up to now everything worked fine. I discovered a problem with SRV request type from my Linux workstation (ip=192.168.15.2