Re: [9fans] An Important Node

2010-05-06 Thread lucio
> Yes, I had to do a fair bit of work to get my OfficeJet 5610 working > with Plan 9. That topic was taken care of in a separate series of > posts a while back. I documented the procedure in my contrib: I recall now: my poor memory should not be taken as a reflection of the value of your efforts a

Re: [9fans] An Important Node

2010-05-05 Thread Akshat Kumar
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 5:08 AM, wrote: >> ... and that's all she wrote. > > Hm, you also added an entry for officejet5610 in /sys/lib/lp/devices, > I presume, as I have nonesuch.  But that's to be expected. Yes, I had to do a fair bit of work to get my OfficeJet 5610 working with Plan 9. That to

Re: [9fans] An Important Node

2010-05-05 Thread lucio
> ... and that's all she wrote. Hm, you also added an entry for officejet5610 in /sys/lib/lp/devices, I presume, as I have nonesuch. But that's to be expected. What I find ultimately disappoining is that I can't get the parallel port on my server to behave in any reasonable way. The man pages s

Re: [9fans] An Important Node

2010-05-05 Thread lucio
> Add Local Printer -> Create New Port (or some such) > with Type of Port: Standard TCP/IP I'm way out of touch. I never even thought of looking for such a feature! ++L

Re: [9fans] An Important Node

2010-05-05 Thread Akshat Kumar
I've setup Windows 7 and Windows XP to do this. For XP: Control Panel -> Printers and Faxes -> Add Printer Add Local Printer -> Create New Port (or some such) with Type of Port: Standard TCP/IP fill in IP and port information, using RAW type of data. Upon choosing a printer from the provided list,

Re: [9fans] An Important Node

2010-05-04 Thread lucio
> So, in order to have Windows see the CPU server as a > network printer, I simply "[Added] a New Printer" on TCP, > port PORT, and IP that of the CPU server, with the device > being Adobe's Generic PostScript Printer, which produces > basic PS pages (something lp(1) on Plan 9 can deal with). What

Re: [9fans] An Important Node

2010-05-03 Thread Akshat Kumar
OK, placing this in /rc/bin/service works well now. Thank you for that suggestion. Best, ak On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 12:07 PM, erik quanstrom wrote: > if you put your script in the listen -t directory, > you won't be none. > > - erik

Re: [9fans] An Important Node

2010-05-03 Thread erik quanstrom
> however, the program runs as user none, and > requires access to /dev/lp7 (which I believe is > not in its namespace, in the first place). > Perhaps this approach would work better if I > ran usb/print on boot up - although still, the > file /dev/lp7 is chmod 660 for user and group > bootes. Idea

Re: [9fans] An Important Node

2010-05-03 Thread Akshat Kumar
I tried this initially, with the following in the file: exec /rc/bin/lp -H -d officejet5610 >>[2] /sys/lib/lp/log/officejet5610 however, the program runs as user none, and requires access to /dev/lp7 (which I believe is not in its namespace, in the first place). Perhaps this approach would work b

Re: [9fans] An Important Node

2010-05-03 Thread erik quanstrom
> On the Plan 9 side, then, the CPU server listens: > > aux/listen1 -tv tcp!*!PORT $home/bin/rc/print & makes more sense to put this script in /rc/bin/service/tcpPORT - erik

[9fans] An Important Node

2010-05-03 Thread Akshat Kumar
With one network- and PS- incapable printer* in the household, and several computers with at least a few users, there was a need to have some sort of network capable printing device. The printer is hooked up via (just for added complexity) USB to the Plan 9 CPU server. Printing amongst Plan 9 comp