Re: [9fans] 9vx and replica/pull on OS X

2010-09-30 Thread Yaroslav
I use replica for several tasks besides usual system update, in several different ways. It (applylog) behaves very reliably when changes go to a tree hosted by a native plan9 fs (fossil in my case), yet many glitches may arise (like those reported by Paul) if the destination is a *nix tree over 9P

Re: [9fans] 9vx and replica/pull on OS X

2010-09-11 Thread ron minnich
OK, just checked, and my vx32 repo at bitbucket.org has the cld patch. I guess yiyus committed it? ron

Re: [9fans] 9vx and replica/pull on OS X

2010-09-11 Thread yy
2010/9/11 Paul Lalonde : > I'm getting essentially every file tagged as "locally modified; will not > update". The option -s for replica could help you with that. I have used replica from 9vx and it works (yes, a lot of warnings, but it works). However, what I usually do is to keep a sysfromiso hg

Re: [9fans] 9vx and replica/pull on OS X

2010-09-11 Thread ron minnich
Hi, I just did a fresh pull for my sysfromiso tree from bitbucket, mk nuke etc. and it built fine. It's a lot of fun to look at, e.g., http://bitbucket.org/rminnich/sysfromiso/changeset/147b5c83d6f4 and see all the good stuff still being done on this kernel :-) ron

Re: [9fans] 9vx and replica/pull on OS X

2010-09-11 Thread Eric Van Hensbergen
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:32 PM, erik quanstrom wrote: >> > What am I doing wrong? >> >> I would argue that, while it is quite cool in principle, replica is >> the wrong way to solve the source distribution problem. I gave up on >> replica a year ago because I got tired of the kinds of problems y

Re: [9fans] 9vx and replica/pull on OS X

2010-09-10 Thread erik quanstrom
> > What am I doing wrong? > > I would argue that, while it is quite cool in principle, replica is > the wrong way to solve the source distribution problem. I gave up on > replica a year ago because I got tired of the kinds of problems you're > having. while some much-needed patches have been slo

Re: [9fans] 9vx and replica/pull on OS X

2010-09-10 Thread ron minnich
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Paul Lalonde wrote: > What am I doing wrong? I would argue that, while it is quite cool in principle, replica is the wrong way to solve the source distribution problem. I gave up on replica a year ago because I got tired of the kinds of problems you're having. s

Re: [9fans] 9vx and replica/pull on OS X

2010-09-10 Thread Eric Van Hensbergen
FWIW, Ron's got a regularly updated snapshot of the source tree in mercurial -- he and I have been using that to keep our 9vx plan 9 directories up to date -- works faster, better, and is more reliable than replica. Using floren's python installation you can even use it under Plan 9. -eri

[9fans] 9vx and replica/pull on OS X

2010-09-10 Thread Paul Lalonde
I want to build a kw kernel, which caused me to want to update my 9vx installation. Have my file system on a case-sensitive remote mounted drive. I'm getting essentially every file tagged as "locally modified; will not update". When a file is good, I get a warning that I can't set the uid; I can pr