Re: [9fans] 1st and 2nd edition ISOs at p9f.org/dl are defective

2021-05-25 Thread David du Colombier
It should be fixed now. -- David du Colombier -- 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T5f0b8bf3259974e3-Mfa6c8559824e7874ecf7383b Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription

Re: [9fans] 1st and 2nd edition ISOs at p9f.org/dl are defective

2021-05-24 Thread David du Colombier
I can reproduce the issue. i'll look at it and eventually fix the ISO images. I've disabled the Joliet and Plan 9 ISO 9660 extensions in these images, so they look closer to the original images, but the old mk9660 produced a slightly different format than the current one. The tarballs and Git rep

Re: [9fans] 1st and 2nd edition ISOs at p9f.org/dl are defective

2021-05-24 Thread Charles Forsyth
The 8+3 restriction is related to that. As often now, Wikipedia supplies more detail. Apparently High Sierra was the basis for the original format, not an extension: I was of course confusing it with Rock Ridge. On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 11:26 PM Charles Forsyth wrote: > I don't know the answer to

Re: [9fans] 1st and 2nd edition ISOs at p9f.org/dl are defective

2021-05-24 Thread Charles Forsyth
I don't know the answer to the following question, which is why I ask it: does that happen if you use 9660srv under Plan 9 (-ish) to access those images? (Perhaps you already are, but it would still be useful to know.) It's quite a long time ago, but as I recall early CD formats took a literal view

[9fans] 1st and 2nd edition ISOs at p9f.org/dl are defective

2021-05-24 Thread Anonymous AWK fan via 9fans
All file names are lower case (this makes some files inaccessible, because there are sometimes multiple files with the same name) and the modes, owners and groups are all --r--r--r-- (d-r-xr-xr-x for directories), cdrom and iso, respectively. Anonymous AWK fan -- Mailfence.com Private and secure