å¨ 2012å¹´11æ28æ¥ææä¸UTC+8ä¸å8æ¶22å30ç§ï¼Bence
Fábiánåéï¼
> but what is _most_ likely is that you really have them initialized two times.
> just do
> g '(op|et)names ?='
>
> you should find 4 initializations. just delete the redundant ones.
>
>
> 2012/11/28 Bence Fábiá
å¨ 2012å¹´11æ28æ¥ææä¸UTC+8ä¸å8æ¶48å09ç§ï¼erik
quanstromåéï¼
> you're right. a quick trip through sort|uniq -d says that FALL is listed
>
> twice.
>
>
>
> - erik
Thank you erik and Bence, it's a good lesson to learn.
å¨ 2012å¹´11æ28æ¥ææä¸UTC+8ä¸å8æ¶48å09ç§ï¼erik
quanstromåéï¼
> you're right. a quick trip through sort|uniq -d says that FALL is listed
>
> twice.
>
>
>
> - erik
Thank you erik, it's a good lesson.
Thank you for your reply, erik.
But I don't quite follow you. Are you suggesting that the error has nothing to
do with "opnames" and "etnames", but is about the following word "memccpy"?
I had grep opnames and etnames before, and finds only one initial place.
And I grep memccpy, no result was f
The message is:
(2050) DATA opnames<1>+116(SB)/4,$string<1>+739(SB)
memccpy: multiple initialization
(2170) DATA etnames<1)+72(SB)/4,$string<1>+912(SB)
memccpy: multiple initialization
I know 2050 is somehow related to the line number where opnames appear in the
code, and so is 2170 with etnam
Damn, google eat my post again.
The problem is solve. Using ftpserver on xp, and ftpfs to mount the dir.
Although it's really slow, it works.
Many thanks to you folks.
In the doubt of news group have eaten my last posts, I post again to make sure
my answer should be know.
Thanks, John, I post my question in the title of the mail,
clearly it's not obvious to be perceive. Sorry for that.
The question is: I had my laptop running under windows xp, and I installed
I'm not sure whether it's stupid to ask this question here.
Maybe it's too easy a question to answer, maybe you think that I am too lazy to
post a question before do a good search on google, or read the document offered.
But English is not my first language, and it is a ton of words to read in
