Re: [9fans] ftpfs ahould not expose "." and ".." directories

2008-04-29 Thread eekee57
Honestly I went with strncmp() over strcmp() on little more than a hunch. I actually prefer strcmp() as looking cleaner, with one less arg and no need to remember the existence fo the null at the end. Maybe I'll change it. As to the style of logic, strncmp() and strcmp() both return zero for an ex

[9fans] ftpfs ahould not expose "." and ".." directories

2008-04-28 Thread eekee57
Hi all. I had a problem trying to use dircp with ftpfs the other day, and made a little patch to ftpfs to fix it. The Problem: Many operating systems expose the psuedo-directories "." and ".." in their directory structure, and understandably many FTP servers running on those operating systems pass

Re: [9fans] Consumers? We the eeevil empire are the consumers!

2008-04-23 Thread eekee57
On Feb 24, 7:47 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Come on, folks, PPC Apple was around for how many years, and the > only port effort I know of was a university project that I'm pretty > sure never got anything released. Why do we not want to do anything > until obsolescence is guaranteed? I think I'l