ron minnich wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Steven D. Vormwald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong here, but don't these require extensive run-time
support, in addition to compiler support? Will the run-time libraries also
be linux libraries
ron minnich wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 8:21 AM, Steven D. Vormwald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So would developers on this platform be encouraged to use languages and
features currently in plan 9 for HPC development, or would they target
existing HPC languages and features, which wo
ron minnich wrote:
In the HPC world, there is lots of conservatism. There is an editor at
LANL, named Fred, written in Fortran, that has been in use for longer
than most of you have been alive. Until very recently, it was a
required part of any HPC system.
So, we're doing a binary compatibility
erik quanstrom wrote:
is not available under Plan 9. (Or is it?) As there is no simple
introduction to Plan 9 new users will just go the easy way and get
Windows or Linux.
lack of an introduction is not the problem. not being unix
is the problem.
Looking too much like UNIX while acting dif
Pietro Gagliardi wrote:
The ultimate echo, actually useful, but no one wants it.
NAME
echo: echo arguments
SYNOPSIS
echo [-1abCDEeilmNnOqrtuVvwXx] [-B base] [-c cmd] [-d char] [-f
file] [-L len] [-o file] [-S voice] [-s char] [args...]
DESCRIPTION
echo outputs its arguments. It ta
