We live, we die, we live again!
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 01:41:43PM +1200, Winston Kodogo wrote:
> I was kind of wondering if there was an option for people who like Microsoft
> development tools to build Plan9 tools, which are admittedly a minority taste
> in the Windows world, without spending several weeks installing 3rd part
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:32:18AM +, Brian Vito wrote:
> Are the /acme/edit commands (as discussed in the Acme paper and included with
> the Inferno version of Acme) included in Plan 9 or plan9port? If not, what is
> the
> workflow replacement? Thanks.
Doesn't the Edit command provide the sa
It's not worth it.
You'll probably think I'm just being flippant, but I'm not.
It's just not worth it.
I thought a web garden was a hobbyist version of a server farm.
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 09:27:57PM +, Giles Hutton wrote:
> better than vim, but acme's text editing was a bit too simplistic compared
> to vim. So my initial intention was to port acme to Go, and add in vi-style
> modal editing.
What text editing features from vim do you miss in Acme?
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 03:42:42PM +, Giles Hutton wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm currently in the process of porting acme to Go
Why?
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:13:26AM -0500, Ryan Gonzalez wrote:
> Every shell has one. You know, like .bashrc, .profile, etc. What's
> plan9port rc's?
It's all there in the manual.
-l If -l is given or the first character of argument
zero is -, rc reads comma
