Thanks. My first memory that 32-bit addressing was necessary was correct.
That's the information I needed.
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T6f94b0ead58544b4-Mb4d51a57ed5a1e941d48aa87
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicb
Plan 9 has run on 68K systems, at least an earlier edition of the system. Check out the 2nd edition paper about the various ports:http://doc.cat-v.org/plan_9/2nd_edition/portThere was a compiler but no kernel for the 68000; the existing kernel assumed 68020 or better.I know I have run 3rd edition o
Is there a virtio driver for the "9P Transport" subsystem (type "09")?
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T5aca8c00a7084d5e-Mcb3955e1ac61464cb9e68895
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
I had the idea that the minimum hardware that Plan 9 had run in was 80386, but
I look and it says minimum is x86 with 16M. And I seem to recall that the
original did run on 8086 (which would have been less than 16M at the time).
So I'm wondering if anyone ever implemented it on 68K.
And I'm als
do you have ethernet on your embedded systems? i did embedded development using plan9 as my desktop for years. being able to mount the embedded system is a great thing.i just compiled u9fs for the embedded system and it just worked.at one point we had a multiplexed terminal and file sharing interfa
On 1/30/25 11:14, Matt Wilbur wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I am trying to learn more about Plan 9 by forcing it into my day-to-day work
> environment.
> I work on embedded systems that I typically use over a serial connection. I
> have a 9front CPU server set up that is connected to a device using a
Hello All,
I am trying to learn more about Plan 9 by forcing it into my day-to-day
work environment.
I work on embedded systems that I typically use over a serial connection.
I have a 9front CPU server set up that is connected to a device using a USB
Serial device (standard FTDI stuff). There is
