Ok I pulled a 9legacy ISO, applied your patch set from this thread above,
and built a 9pi2 kernel. My build now runs as the kernel on a QEMU
raspi2b system.
I didn't realize 9legacy actually had a distribution for some reason I
thought it was only a patch set applied against the old main line. Gla
Yeah it must be patches in 9legacy because pulling the bcm from contrib
and using that does not alone fix the kernel.
Interestingly, I can get a kernel to boot in a raspi1ap emulated image, but
it faults on what I presume is the jump to userland, resets, and auto-boots
the kernel again in an i
> Based on the diffs you supplied, it looks like my bcm
> sources (from the latest r4 ISO) are not the same as yours. I don't use
> 9front. What is the best way to make sure my bcm (and 9) kernel trees are
> the same as your current tree?
A lot has changed in the bcm kernel since the 4th edition I
Plan 9 Foundation is an Oregon nonprofit organization and is awaiting
a status approval as a 501(c)(3) Charitable Organization.
Your donations will NOT be tax deductible, but very much appreciated.
Please contact the Treasurer directly or bo...@p9f.org
Thanks,
On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 7:10 AM plm12
Took a minute to snarf your 9pi2.qemu off of contrib and run it on my
8.0.0... (it wasn't there last night; depends on when 9pio syncs the web
interface, I suppose)
It runs just peachy. Based on the diffs you supplied, it looks like my bcm
sources (from the latest r4 ISO) are not the same as yours
title
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T1efcf2ded187800d-M8f0f2b3fdaee8b1fdb2d4bbf
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
> I'm using version 8.0.0 of QEMU. What version are you using, Mr. Miller?
I've now reinstalled QEMU from debian unstable, which gives me v8.0.4.
Using the 9pi2.qemu in my contrib, it still boots for me, without any
loop at 0x000c.
--
9fans: 9fans
Perm
I tried actually running some realtime processes and the print msg appeared.
Thanks
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Te1d00dae663114b2-M0b15b6c18936d12d96aa47dc
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subs
> > Maybe do the back & forth off list, unless anyone else is interested?
> I'm very interested in learning both about the process and about the
> result. Unless others object, I'd like to follow along here.
Same. Lurking and learning.
On 9/1/23, Richard Miller <9f...@hamnavoe.com> wrote:
> don.bai...@gmail.com:
...
>> Thanks for responding and adding some patches. I am trying to follow
>> along
>> to make it work, if you don't mind a bit of back and forth :-)
>
> Maybe do the back & forth off list, unless anyone else is interest
don.bai...@gmail.com:
> Hmm, I've applied the patches and built the kernel. I can see the image
> loaded at 0x8001, but it is spinning at address 0x000c; is this a
> sdmmc load loop?
I think that's a trap address. On ARM we re-map the trap vectors away from
address 0 to a high segment.
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
