On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 04:05:15PM +0100, Steve Simon wrote:
> I must appologise, though I sent a reply at the time, an out of date x509
> certificate meant the email never reached my ISP.
Hi Steve, thanks anyway.
> What I tried to say was...
>
> > I wonder if the abaco problem you are seeing i
yes, I'm not sure why it doesn't do that, but probably if I try to add that
code I'll soon find out!
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 9:29 PM wrote:
> Quoth un...@cpan.org:
> > Quoth o...@eigenstate.org:
> > > Our compilers will sometimes produce a warning about
> > > a non-interruptible temporary:
> > >
I must appologise, though I sent a reply at the time, an out of date x509
certificate meant the email never reached my ISP.
What I tried to say was...
> I wonder if the abaco problem you are seeing is the global move to
> stronger TLS algorithms. I have backported libcrypt from 9front which
> wa
I do think I build the backend of sam on MSDOS back in the day,
it was most probably the 1st edition plan9 code which was released
as a seperate package (with X11 libraries). (still kicking around
on netlib: http://www.netlib.org/research/)
It require some porting effort but I am pretty sure I di
Hello,
Has there ever been a port of sam -d for DOS?
I tried the win32 port (pf9) on FreeDOS, but it didn't work.
btw this link on sam's homepage (pf9 for 64-bit Windows) is dead:
https://bitbucket.org/mtrS/pf9
Thanks and best,
Mart
--
9fans: 9fans
Permali
> I noticed that you rearranged the patches so the rc ones are now
> consecutive. Do you serve a 9p or there is another way to list the
> patches by date? I'm going to use 9legacy as a base distribution
> so this would be handy.
I don't serve 9P yet, but I've planed to do it.
In the meantime, I t
I noticed that you rearranged the patches so the rc ones are now
consecutive. Do you serve a 9p or there is another way to list the
patches by date? I'm going to use 9legacy as a base distribution
so this would be handy.
Regards,
adr.
--
9fans: 9fans
Permal