Awesome thanks. I attempted this on the command line before posting and the
server requested authentication, to connect. I will try the approach you have
set out here.
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Tf85189f4249fef26-
My i3-3240 (3.4GHz) machine shows
3394 MHz GenuieneIntel Core i7 (cpuid: AX 0x306A9 DX 0xBFFBFBFF)
at bootinng. Frequency is right however Model name is not.
AX value means Family=6, Model=3A which is listed as "Core i7" in
x86intel[] table in /sys/src/9/pc/devarch.c, like:
x86intel[]=
{
{6,
> On Mar 29, 2021, at 4:43 PM, zemned3...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I am about 5 hours into being a Plan 9 user, on both the PI4 and QEmu. I am
> struggling to find the canonical p9fs servers to mount kernel source code,
> update from a the central repo (is this broken with the ownership change of
I am about 5 hours into being a Plan 9 user, on both the PI4 and QEmu. I am
struggling to find the canonical p9fs servers to mount kernel source code,
update from a the central repo (is this broken with the ownership change of
plan 9?) and also a way to load extras such as gitfs. Any handy po
Greetings,
My name is Dmitry Torilov, and I came to you from the GSoC website.
I am delighted with Plan9, but I have never contributed to the project.
I am very interested in the topic of porting go to arm, and I would like to
work on it.
I have experience in go development, I watched Rob Pike's t
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:47 AM Russ Cox wrote:
>
> On March 29, 2021, arn...@skeeve.com wrote:
>
> OK - wasn't kenc ported to Linux for bootstrapping the early
> Go compilers? Is that version general, or not worth my trying to use?
>
>
> The early Go compilers, written in C, were compiled with g
Russ Cox wrote:
> Standard C has moved on, and the Plan 9 C compilers have not kept up.
> They're still fine for Plan 9 C code, but given the choice
> I wouldn't throw anything else at them.
That's pretty definitive. Thanks.
Arnold
--
9fans: 9fans
Permal
On March 29, 2021, arn...@skeeve.com wrote:
> OK - wasn't kenc ported to Linux for bootstrapping the early
> Go compilers? Is that version general, or not worth my trying to use?
The early Go compilers, written in C, were compiled with gcc or clang.
The Plan 9 C compiler was used for the Go runti
OK - wasn't kenc ported to Linux for bootstrapping the early
Go compilers? Is that version general, or not worth my trying to use?
Thanks,
Arnold
Charles Forsyth wrote:
> >
> > I doubt very much that using the Plan 9 C compilers will bring much
> > additional benefit for finding bugs (except b
>
> Anyawys, the faulting address is
>
>addr=0x100061fa0 pc=37930
sorry to reply here as i never got the original mail.
i could reproduce this and it turns out to be a arm64 compiler bug expanding
the -1 offset in the array index to a 32 bit unsigned constant but instruction
issued is a
Quoth arn...@skeeve.com:
> Hi Russ.
>
> Thanks for this. You are probably right, but it's always good to
> test against as many compilers as possible.
>
> Out of curiousity, why is linking against the system libraries so
> hard? I assume a port of kenc to Linux would have a driver program
> tha
>
> I doubt very much that using the Plan 9 C compilers will bring much
> additional benefit for finding bugs (except bugs in the compiler!).
The cross-file type-checking does sometimes pick up unpleasantness caused
by type mismatches.
It was originally added to allow dynamically-loaded object mo
Hi Russ.
Thanks for this. You are probably right, but it's always good to
test against as many compilers as possible.
Out of curiousity, why is linking against the system libraries so
hard? I assume a port of kenc to Linux would have a driver program
that would just invoke the system ld(1). I'
Hi Arnold,
The hard part is not so much the compiling but the linking against
system libraries. Honestly once you have both gcc and clang happy (with
no warnings), I doubt very much that using the Plan 9 C compilers will
bring much additional benefit for finding bugs (except bugs in the
compiler!)
14 matches
Mail list logo
