On 4/21/19, cinap_len...@felloff.net wrote:
> its documented in prep(8)
>
Thanks to you both, Kurt and specially Cinap. As I said, accessing
9front persistently remains on my wish list (no encouragement needed,
I just need to find the time to invest in some research).
It is good news that GPT is
its documented in prep(8)
--
cinap
On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 07:09:27AM +0200, Lucio De Re wrote:
>
> So, to be clear: is there a Plan 9 supported facility to configure a
> drive according to the more modern, "don't knock it until you've tried
> it" (hmm, some here will have some valid criticism, I'd like to hear
> that) disk partiti
Occasionally something restores my faith in sanity: NetBSD has a
simple command line interface for partitioning drives according to the
new canon: GUID.
Now, I've been meaning to install a live(ly) version of 9front and
serve it from my 9legacy server and a few details have interfered with
my effo
On 4/21/19, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> i like that 9front has no silly menu
>
And that says it all. De gustibus...
To me, that seems a lot like farting against thunder, but I have yet
to find a timeout/countdown that I can latch onto. But less than three
seconds means that any distraction
if you know how to get into your system's bios you should be able to
use the same technique to get to our prompt...
i like that 9front has no silly menu
9front boots via an initrd with a script, doesn't it? That script could be
modified to present a menu/prompt, perhaps only if a certain variable is set in
plan9.ini.
On Sat, Apr 20, 2019, at 2:42 AM, hiro wrote:
> hell. i have to do *exactly* the same with same dimension of timeouts
> slightly
