a mixture of clive macos and plan9ports
> On 9 Mar 2018, at 01:45, Aram Hăvărneanu wrote:
>
>> I don't think anyone is running it anymore.
>> At least, I'm not running it.
>> Sorry.
>
> What do you run?
>
> --
> Aram Hăvărneanu
>
Most likely http://lsub.org/ls/clive.html
Looks fun!
Sean
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Aram Hăvărneanu wrote:
> > I don't think anyone is running it anymore.
> > At least, I'm not running it.
> > Sorry.
>
> What do you run?
>
> --
> Aram Hăvărneanu
>
>
> I don't think anyone is running it anymore.
> At least, I'm not running it.
> Sorry.
What do you run?
--
Aram Hăvărneanu
I once used octopus.
It uses inferno as the middle layer of graphics, which made the
octopus somewhat complicated, I felt. I'm not against the inferno,
however, octopus could make the graphics much easier and simpler.
Therefore, using inferno made the purpose unclear I thought.
That's the reason
I don't think anyone is running it anymore.
At least, I'm not running it.
Sorry.
> El 8 mar 2018, a las 13:38, Rudolf Sykora escribió:
>
>> On 3 March 2018 at 20:27, Francisco J Ballesteros wrote:
>> Octopus would run on Plan 9, although we used inferno for (hosted) terminals,
>> and it used Op
On 3 March 2018 at 20:27, Francisco J Ballesteros wrote:
> Octopus would run on Plan 9, although we used inferno for (hosted) terminals,
> and it used Op as the protocol (a descendant of 9p like everyone else),
Ok. So does anybody use octopus these days?
Why not? (Who wouldn't like a ubiquitous e
