On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 14:35:46 +
Rui Carmo wrote:
>
> Perhaps because then you wouldn’t need those other boxes as much? I find the
> notion of having a minimal self-sufficient environment (i.e., one with
> creature comforts like a browser to read documentation) interesting - and
> achievable on
"minimal self-sufficient environment": agreed, the 9front man pages,
documentation and fqa can be read with page, man and mothra for the
web, served by sl's rc-httpd/werc setup.
> On 31 Dec 2017, at 20:43, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> i would be very happy to see a modern browser on plan9, though
>> i would not want anyone to spend a lot of time supporting one.
>
>> in the meantime i just use remote desktop to a windows box.
>
> what's the difference really? i
> On 31 Dec 2017, at 21:05, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I started porting a 9p library and writing an fs for esp8266 using
>> espressif sdk, but stopped once I found out tls1.2 isn't supported (not
>> fixable; bug in firmware).
>> I think esp32 is a better choice, but then, why not use r
