Re: [9fans] Why does Plan 9 use “snarf” instead of “copy”?

2016-09-12 Thread Jules Merit
The EUROcorp fork of plan9 has no snafu. Haven't figured out how to name things for brown nosers to climb the SocLadder of troglodytes. I tried inventing spork(), but who would want to read your e-mails. On Sep 12, 2016 8:00 PM, "Winston Kodogo" wrote: > Channeling my inner Quine here. Did you m

Re: [9fans] Why does Plan 9 use “snarf” instead of “copy”?

2016-09-12 Thread Winston Kodogo
Channeling my inner Quine here. Did you mean: The operation is not "copy" but "snarf". It's called "snarf" because snarf is what it does. Of course the White Knight would also have asked what the name of the operation was called. But be that as it may, a simple explanation of the difference betw

[9fans] Multicast examples

2016-09-12 Thread Chris McGee
Hi All, I'm looking at setting up a multicast dns on plan9. First, I need to be able to write a mdns server and client. I see from the net manual page that there are references to multicast, namely addmulti and remmulti ctl messages. I'm not entirely sure how they work. Does anyone know of mul

Re: [9fans] Why does Plan 9 use “snarf” instead of “copy”?

2016-09-12 Thread Skip Tavakkolian
Zerox is very different. Try this: Zerox a pane, put the cursors of both panes at the same spot and edit one. On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 3:39 AM Robert Raschke wrote: > Hi Mateusz, > > as far as I remember, it was originally called "xerox". But that is > trademarked. No idea where the word "snarf"

Re: [9fans] Why does Plan 9 use “snarf” instead of “copy”?

2016-09-12 Thread Mateusz Piotrowski
On 12 Sep 2016, at 14:27, Rob Pike wrote: > The operation is not to copy but to snarf. It's called snarf because > snarf is what it does. There is no design document. Thank you, Rob! Mateusz

Re: [9fans] Why does Plan 9 use “snarf” instead of “copy”?

2016-09-12 Thread Rob Pike
The operation is not to copy but to snarf. It's called snarf because snarf is what it does. There is no design document. -rob On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > Both 'Zerox' and 'Snarf' are there: > > /sys/src/cmd/acme/cols.c:34 > textinsert(t, 0, L"New Cut Paste Snarf S

Re: [9fans] Why does Plan 9 use “snarf” instead of “copy”?

2016-09-12 Thread Alexander Kapshuk
Both 'Zerox' and 'Snarf' are there: /sys/src/cmd/acme/cols.c:34 textinsert(t, 0, L"New Cut Paste Snarf Sort Zerox Delcol ", 38, TRUE); On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Robert Raschke wrote: > Hi Mateusz, > > as far as I remember, it was originally called "xerox". But that is > trademarked. No id

Re: [9fans] Why does Plan 9 use “snarf” instead of “copy”?

2016-09-12 Thread Robert Raschke
Hi Mateusz, as far as I remember, it was originally called "xerox". But that is trademarked. No idea where the word "snarf" comes from. Cheers, Robby On 12 Sep 2016 12:19, "Mateusz Piotrowski" wrote: Hello, I've discovered Plan 9 recently and became curious about some design decisions. Why th

[9fans] Why does Plan 9 use “snarf” instead of “copy”?

2016-09-12 Thread Mateusz Piotrowski
Hello, I've discovered Plan 9 recently and became curious about some design decisions. Why there is a snarf buffer and not a copy buffer? As it might seem to be a dull question, it is not. I am very interested in the reason behind this decision. I've browsed numerous websites (including cat-v.o