Re: [9fans] [Newsletter] Inferno in a browser window

2016-05-12 Thread jfmxl
Thanks very much. On 2016-05-13 07:15, David Hoskin wrote: http://debu.gs/entries/try-inferno-without-installing-it https://marc.info/?l=9fans&m=144332606307809&w=2 The site itself: http://tryinferno.reverso.be/ From: jfmxl Subject: [Newsletter] [9fans] Inferno in a brows

Re: [9fans] [Newsletter] Inferno in a browser window

2016-05-12 Thread David Hoskin
http://debu.gs/entries/try-inferno-without-installing-it https://marc.info/?l=9fans&m=144332606307809&w=2 The site itself: http://tryinferno.reverso.be/ From: jfmxl Subject: [Newsletter] [9fans] Inferno in a browser window Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 06:41:44 +0700 > Hello > >

Re: [9fans] Inferno in a browser window

2016-05-12 Thread Skip Tavakkolian
There is (was) a browser plugin. I imagine an NaCl or PNaCl based version of emu would be the way to do it these days. On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:42 PM jfmxl wrote: > Hello > > Some while back someone posted a link to an site which loaded what > seemed to be a full instance of Inferno in a browse

[9fans] Inferno in a browser window

2016-05-12 Thread jfmxl
Hello Some while back someone posted a link to an site which loaded what seemed to be a full instance of Inferno in a browser window. I thought I'd bookmarked the site, but I didn't or cannot find it now. Anyone recall the post and link? Thanks.

Re: [9fans] cpu command latency

2016-05-12 Thread Balaji
the ZKP process involves 3 synchronous round trips. SRP used to have same problem but they can now do it in 1.5 round trips. On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Skip Tavakkolian < skip.tavakkol...@gmail.com> wrote: > it might be worth instrumenting the cpu command to time the authenticaiton > step.

Re: [9fans] cpu command latency

2016-05-12 Thread Skip Tavakkolian
it might be worth instrumenting the cpu command to time the authenticaiton step. i think that's where the problem is. On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 3:39 PM Skip Tavakkolian wrote: > what's the latency caused by the auth step? > FYI, from Seattle I see about 8 seconds to establish but as Charles noted,

Re: [9fans] cpu command latency

2016-05-12 Thread arisawa
thanks skip for the information. > 2016/05/12 7:39、Skip Tavakkolian のメール: > FYI, from Seattle I see about 8 seconds to establish but as Charles noted, > it's reasonably fast after that. I am glad if you can show me the raw data measured by for(i in 1 2 3){ time cpu -h HO

Re: [9fans] cpu command latency

2016-05-12 Thread arisawa
Hello, > 2016/05/11 22:44、Kenny Lasse Hoff Levinsen のメール: > > Delete the channel from /srv in the loop to test a full remote mount dance, > including the initial dial. It shouldn't take 3s to dial, though. thanks for the advice. I retried for(i in 1 2 3){ time 9fs $host #unmoun