> On Oct 2, 2015, at 4:53 am, Charles Forsyth wrote:
>
>
> On 1 October 2015 at 15:48, Brantley Coile wrote:
> I think he meant the Plan 9 Lion’s commentary, not the Sixth Edition one.
>
> Yes, and that was in the text I quoted in my reply!
This from jmk to the list iin 2001:
I would have
Jeff Sickel wrote:
> And then if you want all the fancy tools & wrappers groups seem to like
> these days:
Git is best used from the command line. All the tools just get
in the way.
The libgit work is probably the way to go for Plan 9.
Arnold
It's still free. It just takes a heck of a lot of effort to port it to
other platforms after you get addicted to it.
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Jeff Sickel
wrote:
>
> > On Sep 30, 2015, at 2:59 AM, Charles Forsyth
> wrote:
> >
> > Here's a small but representative example.
>
> That’s just
On 1 October 2015 at 18:31, Jeff Sickel wrote:
> > On Sep 30, 2015, at 2:59 AM, Charles Forsyth
> wrote:
> >
> > Here's a small but representative example.
>
> That’s just an example of a C file.
I was really just writing about the difficulty of current C portability in
general.
I hadn't looke
> On Sep 30, 2015, at 2:59 AM, Charles Forsyth
> wrote:
>
> Here's a small but representative example.
That’s just an example of a C file. The joy of Git is the rest of the
requirements to actually use it:
- bash
- perl5
And then if you want all the fancy tools & wrappers groups seem to li
On 1 October 2015 at 15:48, Brantley Coile wrote:
> I think he meant the Plan 9 Lion’s commentary, not the Sixth Edition one.
Yes, and that was in the text I quoted in my reply!
This isn't the answer to the original question, but if you like that type
of decomposition of OS, xv6 is a good one:
https://pdos.csail.mit.edu/6.828/2014/xv6/book-rev8.pdf
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Brantley Coile wrote:
> I think he meant the Plan 9 Lion’s commentary, not the Sixth Edi
I think he meant the Plan 9 Lion’s commentary, not the Sixth Edition one.
> On Oct 1, 2015, at 9:48 AM, Charles Forsyth wrote:
>
>
> On 1 October 2015 at 14:43, Charles Forsyth wrote:
> On 1 October 2015 at 13:06, Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
> By the way, is there any version of the John Lyons
>
On 1 October 2015 at 14:43, Charles Forsyth
wrote:
> On 1 October 2015 at 13:06, Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
>
>> By the way, is there any version of the John Lyons
>> notes on Plan 9 from 1989? They Lyons books says
>> circulation was restricted to distribution Bell Labs.
>> There are two books me
And buy a t-shirt.
On 30/09/2015 5:44 AM, "Kurt H Maier" wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 02:18:20PM -0300, Tiago Natel wrote:
> > is there someone else interested in write a git tool for plan 9 ?
> >
> > []'s
>
> This has been written. You just need to fill out a Secret Plan 9 Super
> Secret So
On 1 October 2015 at 13:06, Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
> By the way, is there any version of the John Lyons
> notes on Plan 9 from 1989? They Lyons books says
> circulation was restricted to distribution Bell Labs.
> There are two books mentioned:
>
It's on Amazon:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Lions-Co
> To answer your question, I don’t have a copy.
I seem to recall that it was eventually released in the public domain?
Lucio.
I saw a copy when I was at the Labs in 1990. It was very early in Plan 9’s
evolution so it would be mostly of historic interest today. I got the
impression that neither John nor the OS designers were particularly pleased
with the commentary. I enjoyed reading it, but Nemo’s books closer to today
Thanks, that worked.
By the way, is there any version of the John Lyons
notes on Plan 9 from 1989? They Lyons books says
circulation was restricted to distribution Bell Labs.
There are two books mentioned:
Plan 9: Volume 1: Kernel Source Code
Plan 9: Volume 2: Summaries & Commentary
Mark
On Wed
14 matches
Mail list logo
