Re: [9fans] On Linux, what is the rc init file?

2015-08-30 Thread Teodoro Santoni
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 08:07:06PM +0100, Charles Forsyth wrote: > rcmain is shared. the profile is per-user As long as $PLAN9 is shared. But my conf is to be used in a machine which is single-user, atm. -- Teodoro Santoni Something is wrong. I don't wanna compile 20 KB of Go code to list files.

Re: [9fans] On Linux, what is the rc init file?

2015-08-30 Thread Charles Forsyth
On 30 August 2015 at 19:25, Teodoro Santoni wrote: > I don't see any real difference between adding modified versions of my > .bashrc > things to rcmain or putting them to $home/lib/profile > rcmain is shared. the profile is per-user

Re: [9fans] On Linux, what is the rc init file?

2015-08-30 Thread Teodoro Santoni
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 10:02:54AM -0700, erik quanstrom wrote: > > the .bashrc lookalike is *not* rcmain. rcmain is the second > phase of the rc virtual machine bootstrapping itself. > > the .bashrc lookalike is $home/lib/profile. > > - erik I don't see any real difference between adding modif

Re: [9fans] On Linux, what is the rc init file?

2015-08-30 Thread Ryan Gonzalez
Low space on main HDD, but plenty on external. On August 30, 2015 12:00:57 PM CDT, erik quanstrom wrote: >On Fri Aug 28 10:24:30 PDT 2015, rym...@gmail.com wrote: > >> YES!! That was it! My plan9home directory didn't contain a bin >folder; that >> was somewhere else. When I symlinked it there, i

Re: [9fans] On Linux, what is the rc init file?

2015-08-30 Thread erik quanstrom
On Fri Aug 28 09:09:09 PDT 2015, asbras...@gmail.com wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:49:41AM -0400, s...@9front.org wrote: > > Take a look at $PLAN9/rcmain. > > > > sl > > Well, punch me in the face and call me Suzanne! > That changes everything, because absence of a .bashrc > lookalike was t

Re: [9fans] On Linux, what is the rc init file?

2015-08-30 Thread erik quanstrom
On Fri Aug 28 10:24:30 PDT 2015, rym...@gmail.com wrote: > YES!! That was it! My plan9home directory didn't contain a bin folder; that > was somewhere else. When I symlinked it there, it worked! Thank you! > > out of curiousity, why use a non-standard install? - erik