On Mon, 02 Feb 2015 19:52:08 PST erik quanstrom wrote:
> On Mon Feb 2 13:20:08 PST 2015, ba...@bitblocks.com wrote:
> > On Mon, 02 Feb 2015 20:54:02 GMT Skip Tavakkolian om> wrote:
> > >
> > > hardkernel's odroid-c1 is similar and slightly better performance for the
> > > same price; any sense
On Mon Feb 2 13:20:08 PST 2015, ba...@bitblocks.com wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Feb 2015 20:54:02 GMT Skip Tavakkolian
> wrote:
> >
> > hardkernel's odroid-c1 is similar and slightly better performance for the
> > same price; any sense which port might be easier?
>
> Odroid-c1 is Cortex-A5 while Pi2 i
Some documentation can be found here:
http://elinux.org/RPi_Documentation#Raspberry_Pi_Processor_Broadcom_System-On-Chip:
On 2/2/15 3:37 PM, Joe Bowers wrote:
Does anybody know where to look for documentation on the changes, or
general documentation for the bcm2836?
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 1:
Re: Ether speed
I was just asking in case there was a perfmormance improvment to be had for
free.
To be honest, the ether performance is not really a limiting feature of the
pi for me, if fact the cpu and ether are a fair match for each other.
A significantly faster cpu would upset this balance
Does anybody know where to look for documentation on the changes, or
general documentation for the bcm2836?
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Bakul Shah wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Feb 2015 20:54:02 GMT Skip Tavakkolian <
> skip.tavakkol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > hardkernel's odroid-c1 is similar and s
On Mon, 02 Feb 2015 20:54:02 GMT Skip Tavakkolian
wrote:
>
> hardkernel's odroid-c1 is similar and slightly better performance for the
> same price; any sense which port might be easier?
Odroid-c1 is Cortex-A5 while Pi2 is Cortex-A7 so Pi2 is more
performant (but has worse ethernet and horrible
hardkernel's odroid-c1 is similar and slightly better performance for the
same price; any sense which port might be easier?
http://www.hardkernel.com/main/products/prdt_info.php?g_code=G141578608433
On Mon Feb 02 2015 at 5:15:34 AM Richard Miller <9f...@hamnavoe.com> wrote:
> > Noted it *should
>> Any further improvement will probably be bounded by the simple synchronous
>> i/o model of usb in Plan 9 (built for comfort, not for speed).
>
> any suggestions on a more performant model?
More asynchrony => fill more frames with packets.
On Mon Feb 2 03:13:54 PST 2015, 9f...@hamnavoe.com wrote:
> Ethernet performance was improved quite a bit by the introduction
> of the etherusb kernel driver - before that, packets were going between
> usb and ether queues via a user space process.
>
> Any further improvement will probably be bou
The difference between Armv6 and Armv7 isn't it?
On 2/2/15 7:14 AM, Richard Miller wrote:
Noted it *should* be backwards compatible with previous software. Does a
9fan wish to vet the 9pi release against this new hardware?
Compatible with user level software, yes. But it will need a new kernel,
> Noted it *should* be backwards compatible with previous software. Does a
> 9fan wish to vet the 9pi release against this new hardware?
Compatible with user level software, yes. But it will need a new kernel,
because it has 4 x cortex-a7 cores compared with 1 x arm11 on the older pi.
Just saw this come up on my Facebook feed:
http://www.raspberrypi.org/raspberry-pi-2-on-sale/
Noted it *should* be backwards compatible with previous software. Does a
9fan wish to vet the 9pi release against this new hardware? I'd love to
give it a go, but I'm not in a position time wise, being m
Ethernet performance was improved quite a bit by the introduction
of the etherusb kernel driver - before that, packets were going between
usb and ether queues via a user space process.
Any further improvement will probably be bounded by the simple synchronous
i/o model of usb in Plan 9 (built for
13 matches
Mail list logo
