On Fri, 06 Jun 2014 10:48:21 +0530 Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan
wrote:
> Well, looks like I cannot run any binaries anymore and getting the
> suicide message! I don't have anything critical on this vm image and
> can re-install it. But I want to see if I can recover it and how. I
> will re-read the
Well, looks like I cannot run any binaries anymore and getting the
suicide message! I don't have anything critical on this vm image and
can re-install it. But I want to see if I can recover it and how. I
will re-read the "syscall 53" thread to look for any solutions.
Ramakrishnan
On Fri, Jun 6,
no. it just makes the kernels malloc arena limit a bit smaller than
it should be.
--
cinap
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 8:51 AM, erik quanstrom wrote:
> On Thu Jun 5 23:17:37 EDT 2014, vu3...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just saw a suicide message on 9atom running on plan9 while updating
>> the system:
>>
>> % replica/pull -v /dist/replica/network
>>
>> After a while, I saw this printed,
Could this solve the 'why is swap so crappy?'
On 05/06/2014 11:58 AM, wrote:
> correct.
>
> --
> cinap
>
>
On Thu Jun 5 23:17:37 EDT 2014, vu3...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just saw a suicide message on 9atom running on plan9 while updating
> the system:
>
> % replica/pull -v /dist/replica/network
>
> After a while, I saw this printed, but the replica/pull is proceeding
> without any problem.
>
>
Hi,
I just saw a suicide message on 9atom running on plan9 while updating
the system:
% replica/pull -v /dist/replica/network
After a while, I saw this printed, but the replica/pull is proceeding
without any problem.
(not completely readable because stats window overwrote the screen)
... bad sy
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Aram Hăvărneanu wrote:
> Plan 9 doesn't have virtio ethernet driver (except mischief's, which I
> don't think is ready for public consumption yet).
You will also need a virtio-scsi driver; GCE does not offer
virtio-blk. But it should work just fine when both driv
Nice!
On Jun 4, 2014, at 8:14 PM, s...@9front.org wrote:
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://code.google.com/p/plan9front/wiki/fqa0&k=ZVNjlDMF0FElm4dQtryO4A%3D%3D%0A&r=%2FN9d7W2LRwZks3eyFNLr8Q%3D%3D%0A&m=932ql2s0yZzSIWvDmA7Ow3MAsKVfP6fSFQC%2Fj%2BdntMU%3D%0A&s=5073da3bad45a50f3d327
> What is it exactly?
Just another step on the path to the one true operating system, OS X with
Golang.
oh, but you missed a spot in lock.
- erik
> we do that in ilock() and canlock() so it's a bug I think to not do it also
> in lock().
> The field is only used in iprintcanlock which use canlock(), not lock(), so
> this
> if fine, but for consistency it would be better to also do it in lock() no?
ilock and unlock could assert(l->m->machno
On Thu Jun 5 06:36:36 EDT 2014, charles.fors...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 5 June 2014 06:11, OMAR RADWAN wrote:
>
> > I just did, though I cannot find anything about the kernel architecture
>
>
> Fortunately, there is a book about it. http://lsub.org/who/nemo/9.pdf which
> might have been updated
On 5 June 2014 06:11, OMAR RADWAN wrote:
> I just did, though I cannot find anything about the kernel architecture
Fortunately, there is a book about it. http://lsub.org/who/nemo/9.pdf which
might have been updated to 4th Edtion,
but the overall structure is similar, although with many improvem
14 matches
Mail list logo
