the 9 schedulers guts break down to the following loop. this
is the improved version, abstracted a bit (by hand)
spllo();
for(;;){
for(i = Npri-1; i >= 0; i--)
->a for(p = runqueue[i]; p != nil; p = p->rproc)
if(s
On 30 May 2014 14:03, Julius Schmidt wrote:
> Comparing an int to a u16int causes the int to be cast to unsigned int,
> instead of the u16int being promoted to int and then compared (as I would
> argue the C89 standard specifies).
Ken's compiler implements the original unsigned-preserving rule
I have found what I believe to be a compiler bug: Comparing an int to a
u16int causes the int to be cast to unsigned int, instead of the u16int
being promoted to int and then compared (as I would argue the C89
standard specifies).
As a result -1 < u is false for any u16int u. Or is this intende
