Seems there is some interest in this chip, and the board. As you said
Henry, state machines would run very quickly in parallel - I had some wad
arguing that an FPGA is the only thing you need, but nothing beats a hard
core for hard tasks. Grid it up in parallel, times sixteen, and thats a
fair bit
Parallella seems very cool. I'll probably pick one up when I have free
time.
I've worked with the Zynq chip on board, which is also great. For $99 it's
one hell of a dev board, considering you get an FPGA with hard ARM cores,
as well as the Ephiphany chip.
The Ephiphany processor fills in the gap
Oh, its ok. I like the GSoC idea. I just don't think I'm GSoC material, I'm
hardware type, even if I will be a uni student this year going forward -
"If it draws blood, its hardware" as the old maxim goes.
The Parallella board is US$99, a far more modest investment in hardware
than a GizmoBoard as
> Thoughts? Comments? Critique? Flames?
I guess this is the real value of efforts like GSOC, if only they
could be extended to a much greater public either with an infinite
budget or by pushing a far more socially-aware ethos.
I'll refrain from pontificating further.
++L
I suppose, if you bug me enough, and I have some time up my sleeve (like
3:30am in the morning when I can't sleep) I'll try typing a coherent reply.
I don't G+, I hardly ever use their 3D printing group, which I think has
some great suff, I think its another duplicity of an already old concept.
Th
> Thoughts? Comments? Critique? Flames?
Sounds like fun. I would suggest keeping (some of) us posted. Maybe
the occasional posting on G+?
++L
Hello 9fans,
I saw references to the GreenArrays chip on list, and did some more
investigation:
http://www.parallella.org/board/
I thought this may be a worthy target of even a Styx-on-a-chip
implementation. I have contacted their forums, and one of their moderators
said it would be a good idea.
http://www.qv.co.nz/property/property-details/9-atom-lane-woolston-christchurch/2367451
- erik
On Tue Feb 4 12:15:21 EST 2014, k...@sciops.net wrote:
> Quoting erik quanstrom :
>
> > it looks like the issues are just a place for spam:
> >
> > http://code.swtch.com/plan9port/issues?status=new&status=open
> >
> > does anyone have any suggestions on reducing or eliminating the spam?
> >
>
>
Quoting erik quanstrom :
it looks like the issues are just a place for spam:
http://code.swtch.com/plan9port/issues?status=new&status=open
does anyone have any suggestions on reducing or eliminating the spam?
In the past, bitbucket has been responsive to someone with admin
control of the
it looks like the issues are just a place for spam:
http://code.swtch.com/plan9port/issues?status=new&status=open
does anyone have any suggestions on reducing or eliminating the spam?
- erik
11 matches
Mail list logo
