On Jan 5, 2014, at 11:39 PM, cinap_len...@felloff.net wrote:
> instead of randomly switching distributoins, why not investigate
> what hardware is actually supported and install such hardware?
If you'll read my email again, you'll note that I mentioned this. I don't want
to buy a new piece of har
instead of randomly switching distributoins, why not investigate
what hardware is actually supported and install such hardware?
you can easily move drivers from 9atom or labs or 9front
any way arround. it doesnt matter.
rules of acquisition:
get a intel gigabit nic for example. look in the drive
On Jan 5, 2014, at 8:03 PM, Steven Stallion wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Patryk Laurent wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> I just joined the list, and so I missed your question. But I also opted for
>> going with the vanilla distribution. Enjoy -- it's been pretty fun so far!
>>
>> Pa
On Jan 05, 2014, at 09:09 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: But the reality is: the labs are no more. No funding, no interest, no anything. Geoff and Jim are due for retirement from this mailing list. (Jim left ages ago, in fact.) Let's let them go in peace. I'm fairly new here, but it seems that so lon
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 11:13 PM, andrey mirtchovski
wrote:
> devmnt is all that's needed to have community. somebody, somewhere,
> will reinvent it badly.
I couldn't help but chuckle. I think anyone who has ever had to
navigate and deal with bugs in devmnt would quite agree!
Steve
devmnt is all that's needed to have community. somebody, somewhere,
will reinvent it badly.
Welcome to what is becoming something indistinguishable from the thousands
of "linux blame-game mailing lists. Grow up. Read a good book. Go to the
beach.
brucee
On 6 January 2014 16:01, Steven Stallion wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg
> wrote:
>
> > "... what works
On Jan 5, 2014, at 9:01 PM, Steven Stallion wrote:
>> In the case of 'The Labs' these days, sharing seems to be an anathema.
>> Acceptance of outside code? Never.
>
> I'm not certain this is a completely fair criticism. The Labs is quite
> a bit smaller than it used to be these days. Patienc
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> "... what works for me."
>
> That's the part that frustrates me these days. No sharing. Inside or out.
I'd suggest taking a look at contrib/stallion (particularly patch and
src) before adding yet more vitriol to the list.
> In the cas
> Works fine for me on a variety of x86 hardware. At the moment I use
> Pineview D525 boards with no trouble at all. If I happen to run into
> hardware that's not supported, I write a driver. Honestly, it's the
> same business you get with any other distribution. I don't
> particularly care for ki
+1
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
>
> On Jan 5, 2014, at 8:03 PM, Steven Stallion wrote:
>
>> There are a few of us that still hold out hope for the Labs
>> distribution.
>
> But realistically, for how much longer? The past year has shown the love is
> gone. I haven't
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
>
> On Jan 5, 2014, at 8:03 PM, Steven Stallion wrote:
>
>> There are a few of us that still hold out hope for the Labs
>> distribution.
>
> But realistically, for how much longer? The past year has shown the love is
> gone. I haven't be
On Jan 5, 2014, at 8:03 PM, Steven Stallion wrote:
> There are a few of us that still hold out hope for the Labs
> distribution.
But realistically, for how much longer? The past year has shown the love is
gone. I haven't been able to run a labs distribution on physical hardware for
years.
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Patryk Laurent wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> I just joined the list, and so I missed your question. But I also opted for
> going with the vanilla distribution. Enjoy -- it's been pretty fun so far!
>
> Patryk
>
>
>
>> On Jan 5, 2014, at 15:54, Alex Jordan wrote:
>>
>>
Hi Alex,
I just joined the list, and so I missed your question. But I also opted for
going with the vanilla distribution. Enjoy -- it's been pretty fun so far!
Patryk
> On Jan 5, 2014, at 15:54, Alex Jordan wrote:
>
>> On Mon Dec 30 21:03:24 EST 2013, alexander3223...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
On Mon Dec 30 21:03:24 EST 2013, alexander3223...@gmail.com wrote:
> Basically, would you guys recommend I try the Bell Labs
> distribution of Plan 9, 9front, or 9atom as my first installation?
Since no one seems to have an opinion on this, I'm going with the Bell
Labs distribution. We'll see how i
"Plan 9 Inside"?
I would buy products with that sticker.
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 4:42 AM, wrote:
> At Fri, 03 Jan 2014 17:11:02 -0500,
> Jay Kruer wrote:
> >
> > [1 ]
> >
> > [2 ]
> > Looks really nice. However, Glenda will forever hold a special place
> > in my heart. Perhaps this would be a
At Fri, 03 Jan 2014 17:11:02 -0500,
Jay Kruer wrote:
>
> [1 ]
>
> [2 ]
> Looks really nice. However, Glenda will forever hold a special place
> in my heart. Perhaps this would be a good logo for 9front?
>
Thanks for the feedback. I wasn't really intending to replace Glenda
(that would be dee
Quoting Rudolf Sykora :
PS.: It's a pity there isn't such a thing like plan9 that would
just work :)
Plan 9 works fine. It's gnu crap that is difficult.
9front experimented with providing binary packages for various things
and it was more trouble than it was worth
khm
On 5 January 2014 14:12, wrote:
> % 9fs sources
> % cd /n/sources
> % time grep chess lsr
> ./contrib/steve/root/sys/src/cmd/mkmk/9port/gnu/chess 755 1229510622 697
> ./plan9/sys/src/cmd/gs/examples/chess.ps 664 1137452689 61791
> 0.58u 0.18s 315.60r grep chess lsr
>
> So here are results I
On 5 January 2014 15:36, erik quanstrom wrote:
>> Thanks, this is possibly a way, but, at least in my case, this takes ages...
>> (Say it can run for >45 mins; maybe much more; I do not know the true
>> reason why,
>> but I intuitively suspect the protocol.)
>> Therefore I asked for a more specifi
On 19 December 2013 17:22, Rudolf Sykora wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> already for some time I've been using secstored+factotum+ssh-agent
> on linux with p9p. The machine, call it 1, runs basically all the time and
> let's presume I am logged on it all the time, too.
> The problem/inconvenience I'v
> Thanks, this is possibly a way, but, at least in my case, this takes ages...
> (Say it can run for >45 mins; maybe much more; I do not know the true
> reason why,
> but I intuitively suspect the protocol.)
> Therefore I asked for a more specific pointer.
> Also, generally, there should be a quick
> On 5 January 2014 14:12, wrote:
>> It runs much faster if you search in the lsr index file:
>>
>> % 9fs sources
>> % cd /n/sources
>> % time grep chess lsr
>> ./contrib/steve/root/sys/src/cmd/mkmk/9port/gnu/chess 755 1229510622 697
>> ./plan9/sys/src/cmd/gs/examples/chess.ps 664 1137452689 6179
On 5 January 2014 14:12, wrote:
> It runs much faster if you search in the lsr index file:
>
> % 9fs sources
> % cd /n/sources
> % time grep chess lsr
> ./contrib/steve/root/sys/src/cmd/mkmk/9port/gnu/chess 755 1229510622 697
> ./plan9/sys/src/cmd/gs/examples/chess.ps 664 1137452689 61791
> 0.58u
> On 5 January 2014 12:27, Conor Williams wrote:
>> term%9fs sources
>> term% cd /n/sources/contrib
>> term% du -a . | grep chess
>
> Thanks, this is possibly a way, but, at least in my case, this takes ages...
> (Say it can run for >45 mins; maybe much more; I do not know the true
> reason why,
On 5 January 2014 12:27, Conor Williams wrote:
> term%9fs sources
> term% cd /n/sources/contrib
> term% du -a . | grep chess
Thanks, this is possibly a way, but, at least in my case, this takes ages...
(Say it can run for >45 mins; maybe much more; I do not know the true
reason why,
but I intuiti
> if you want to do the search dressed as a priest, by all means, go ahead my
> firend...
> *noun*
>
>1. *1*.
>the prescribed official dress of the clergy.
>"Cardinal Bea in full canonicals"
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 12:03 PM, wrote:
>
>> > term%9fs sources
>> > term% c
if you want to do the search dressed as a priest, by all means, go ahead my
firend...
*noun*
1. *1*.
the prescribed official dress of the clergy.
"Cardinal Bea in full canonicals"
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 12:03 PM, wrote:
> > term%9fs sources
> > term% cd /n/sources/contrib
> > term%
> term%9fs sources
> term% cd /n/sources/contrib
> term% du -a . | grep chess
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Rudolf Sykora wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> perhaps it's there but I can't find it...
>>
>> Is there a chess game on plan9?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Ruda
>>
>>
The canonical way to this is
term%9fs sources
term% cd /n/sources/contrib
term% du -a . | grep chess
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Rudolf Sykora wrote:
> Hello,
>
> perhaps it's there but I can't find it...
>
> Is there a chess game on plan9?
>
> Thanks
> Ruda
>
>
so nobody uses secstored+factotum+ssh-agent on linux
with p9p like I do?
Thanks!
Ruda
On 19 December 2013 17:22, Rudolf Sykora wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> already for some time I've been using secstored+factotum+ssh-agent
> on linux with p9p. The machine, call it 1, runs basically all the time
Hello,
perhaps it's there but I can't find it...
Is there a chess game on plan9?
Thanks
Ruda
33 matches
Mail list logo
