Oh, then I got a wrong impression somewhere (don't know where) that it
didn't. Maybe it doesn't in LE or BE or something restrictive like this and
I extended. Anyway if it does it makes for a neat use for Yúns.
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Skip Tavakkolian <
skip.tavakkol...@gmail.com> wrote:
Plan 9 has run on MIPS machines almost since inception. Mikrotik 450g is
the latest. checkout /sys/src/9/rb
mikro% cat '#P/cputype'
MIPS 24k 680
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Rubén Berenguel wrote:
> Plan9 on a MIPS processor?
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Skip Tavakkolian <
> skip
yes. i would guess that the ATmega would barely be able to handle a 9P
implementation.
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Rubén Berenguel wrote:
> Plan9 on a MIPS processor?
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Skip Tavakkolian <
> skip.tavakkol...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Is anyone working on
Plan9 on a MIPS processor?
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Skip Tavakkolian <
skip.tavakkol...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Is anyone working on a port? Any thoughts on viability?
>
> -Skip
>
Is anyone working on a port? Any thoughts on viability?
-Skip
> No :) ipsec in plan9 is VERY limited, look at esp.c (/sys/src/9/ip/esp.c)
that is the subset that is most useful. there are several small
additions to this in 9atom that you may find useful. esp (ha)
ckwindow, and setalg.
- erik
No :) ipsec in plan9 is VERY limited, look at esp.c (/sys/src/9/ip/esp.c)
2013/10/29 Steve Simon
> I asked about the linux app VPNC a few days ago, however plan9 already has
> an IPsec implementation, it would need (at least) l2tp to speak Windows VPN
> and maybe xauth as well (I haven't done m
Hi,
I would like to make a patch of Acme to restrict of sending of events.
In a 'ctl' file of a window will be send string 'events xxx', where xxx - a
list of events Acme can send.
For example, 'events LXx' allows Acme to send events about looking in a
body and executing in a tag and in the body o
On 29 October 2013 17:56, Friedrich Psiorz wrote:
> this should do the trick
>
> /A/+#0;/B/-#0
> g/CC/ s/CC/DD/g
> p
Thanks for the suggestion, the g construct didn't come to my mind.
However, it doesn't work for me: again, if CC is there, it works;
if it's not, then the final dot only contains t
