date:20120421

Re: [9fans] System build: /sparc64 file does not exist; NOT on sparc64

2012-04-21 Thread Lucio De Re

> I am not on sparc64 machine. I tried to disable all arch but (6 9) in > mkfile, but then build fails thus: What are you on? Obviously there is an error in the build procedure, but it would be useful to know what is triggering it. On my workstation: term% cat /dev/archctl cpu

[9fans] System build: /sparc64 file does not exist; NOT on sparc64

2012-04-21 Thread Strake

Hello. I wish to build Plan 9, but build fails thus: % pwd /sys/src % mk install ... cd libmach 6c -FTVw -I/sys/src/cmd (2 5 7 8 q u)^.c u.c:7 6c: '/sparc64' file does not exist: /sparc64/include/ureg.h ... % I am not on sparc64 machine. I tried to disable all arch but (6 9) in mkfile, but then bu

Re: [9fans] Real time Glenda

2012-04-21 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg

From proc(3): period nu Set the real-time scheduling period of the process to nu, where n is an optionally signed number con- taining an optional decimal point and u is one of s, ms, us, µs, ns, or empty. The time is inter-

Re: [9fans] Real time Glenda

2012-04-21 Thread Iruatã Souza

On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Don Bailey wrote: > Has anyone attempted to create a real time version of Plan 9? What would this > effort require? Would substantial changes to the kernel be needed? > > D http://doc.cat-v.org/plan_9/real_time/

Re: [9fans] Real time Glenda

2012-04-21 Thread Andreas Wagner

http://doc.cat-v.org/plan_9/real_time/ On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Don Bailey wrote: > Has anyone attempted to create a real time version of Plan 9? What would this > effort require? Would substantial changes to the kernel be needed? > > D

[9fans] Real time Glenda

2012-04-21 Thread Don Bailey

Has anyone attempted to create a real time version of Plan 9? What would this effort require? Would substantial changes to the kernel be needed? D

Re: [9fans] System patch failed: Permission denied

2012-04-21 Thread David du Colombier

> I thought that patch would use full path if -p not given, > but it seems otherwise. No. Without -p, patch retains only the last element in the path. There are new files in your patch, but you can't usually create files into /. That's why it failed. Patch is a bit confusing because it hasn't sho

Re: [9fans] System patch failed: Permission denied

2012-04-21 Thread Strake

On 21/04/2012, David du Colombier <0in...@gmail.com> wrote: > If this is the patch I'm thinking about, try: > > % ape/patch -p1 < /usr/glenda/nix.diff Thanks. It worked. I thought that patch would use full path if -p not given, but it seems otherwise. Cheers, strake