I have plans for something related to it in the future, but nix goes before that
and it will still take a long time to get there.
So, for me, it's just the system I use for development (working on nix, mostly).
On Mar 2, 2012, at 7:47 PM, Jack Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Fr
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Francisco J Ballesteros wrote:
> Given the lag in publication, this system is no longer under development
> (though we are still using it), but here's a paper about the Octopus.
Hey Francisco,
First, I really like the ideas in Octopus. I think it was extremely
we
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 05:23:26PM +0100, Nicolas Bercher wrote:
>
> Here at CNRS, you are starting to struggle against this crazy system:
>
> 1) we pay to submit papers
> 2) we pay to read papers from others
> 3) we have to pay more if we want our papers to be freely accessible
> 4) we are n
Ok. They said explicitly that I can post pre-prints of the paper at web sites.
http://lsub.org/ls/export/ojss.ps
On Mar 2, 2012, at 5:32 PM, Nemo wrote:
> I'm trying to clear that out, we'll see.
>
> On Mar 2, 2012, at 5:27 PM, John Floren wrote:
>>
>> Unless Elsevier is even more evil that I
On 02/03/2012 17:27, John Floren wrote:
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Nicolas Bercher wrote:
On 02/03/2012 13:11, Charles Forsyth wrote:
Welcome to the world of Elsevier, Springer and Wiley.
On 2 March 2012 10:29, Francisco J Ballesteroswrote:
WoW! I hate them.
It seems my university
Tread carefully.
A recent copyright case did not go well for the author of a paper.
On Mar 2, 2012, at 10:32 AM, Nemo wrote:
> I'm trying to clear that out, we'll see.
>
> On Mar 2, 2012, at 5:27 PM, John Floren wrote:
>>
>> Unless Elsevier is even more evil that I thought, Nemo should still b
I'm trying to clear that out, we'll see.
On Mar 2, 2012, at 5:27 PM, John Floren wrote:
>
> Unless Elsevier is even more evil that I thought, Nemo should still be
> able to post a PDF on lsub.org. Now, if they're really evil, they got
> exclusive rights...
>
> John
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Nicolas Bercher wrote:
> On 02/03/2012 13:11, Charles Forsyth wrote:
>>
>> Welcome to the world of Elsevier, Springer and Wiley.
>>
>> On 2 March 2012 10:29, Francisco J Ballesteros wrote:
>>
>>> WoW! I hate them.
>>> It seems my university is subscribed and I coul
On 02/03/2012 13:11, Charles Forsyth wrote:
Welcome to the world of Elsevier, Springer and Wiley.
On 2 March 2012 10:29, Francisco J Ballesteros wrote:
WoW! I hate them.
It seems my university is subscribed and I could browse it freely…
I'll talk to you off list.
Here at CNRS, you are sta
The next time I visit London will include a walking tour of the
place that started all of this mess. Sadly, I think the price
to join the information club has been increasing.
On Mar 2, 2012, at 6:11 AM, Charles Forsyth wrote:
> Welcome to the world of Elsevier, Springer and Wiley.
>
> On 2 Mar
Welcome to the world of Elsevier, Springer and Wiley.
On 2 March 2012 10:29, Francisco J Ballesteros wrote:
> WoW! I hate them.
> It seems my university is subscribed and I could browse it freely…
> I'll talk to you off list.
WoW! I hate them.
It seems my university is subscribed and I could browse it freely…
I'll talk to you off list.
On Mar 2, 2012, at 11:24 AM, Aram Hăvărneanu wrote:
>> Given the lag in publication, this system is no longer under development
>> (though we are still using it), but here's a paper abo
> Given the lag in publication, this system is no longer under development
> (though we are still using it), but here's a paper about the Octopus.
> http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016412121200043X
It asks me for $31.50 to download the paper.
--
Aram Hăvărneanu
Given the lag in publication, this system is no longer under development
(though we are still using it), but here's a paper about the Octopus.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016412121200043X
I post it here because it's related to Plan 9.
14 matches
Mail list logo
