> But what is this interrupt? Should I be catching it? How can I make a
> change that is an improvement instead of a hack?
>
it's an access violation. check the docs.
- erik
Oops, when it was "hanging there" it was sending out DHCP queries. So
it appears I'm on my way.
But what is this interrupt? Should I be catching it? How can I make a
change that is an improvement instead of a hack?
> I figured out I can't iprint my way out of the problem, because iprint
> doesn't work until after trapinit is over.
you can wave() your way out.
> I added a special case to intrs so that if ibits is 0x0010 and the
> sort is Irqbridge, we just turn off that bit in the irq mask, and
> uncomme
I figured out I can't iprint my way out of the problem, because iprint
doesn't work until after trapinit is over.
I added a special case to intrs so that if ibits is 0x0010 and the
sort is Irqbridge, we just turn off that bit in the irq mask, and
uncommented several debuggy iprints.
I found t
> Because I saw the "#u/u" right before the message, I tried turning off
> the USB entirely by commenting it out in the plug file. The "#u/u" at
> the beginning of the line went away, but the "spurious irqbridge
> interrupt: 0010" messages continue.
that's an invalid access error. unfortunate
On Sat Jul 9 17:03:15 EDT 2011, rminn...@gmail.com wrote:
> apropos temperature some of the embedded vendors test some of
> their boards by immersing them in boiling water, or so they tell me.
>
> ouch!
no, sure doesn't sound good. i prefer mine deep fried.
- erik
apropos temperature some of the embedded vendors test some of
their boards by immersing them in boiling water, or so they tell me.
ouch!
ron
On 7/9/11, erik quanstrom wrote:
> as a wag, i would start by tweaking ether1116.c (sic) to leave the
> second port alone.
Wagged. It appears from the code in devether.c that the MaxEther enum
in devether.h is what controls how many ethernet cards are frobbed. I
changed MaxEther from 2 to 1. It s
Again, great point. An evaluation board built around S3C2440 I experimented
with worked surprisingly well at 50+ degrees Celsius ambient temperature,
no ventilation, running straight for over two months until somebody turned
it off. And it wasn't even near industrial grade. Linux support for tha
Hello!
I'm new to plan9 and have been following this mailing list for about a
month. I've been trying to get through the mountain of reading, but I'm not
done. I want to know if plan9 will work on my set up.
Clevo w86cu laptop, 4GB DDR3 RAM, 1080p screen, nvidia GTX 285 graphics
card, intel cor
as a wag, i would start by tweaking ether1116.c (sic) to leave the
second port alone. remember that one disadvantage of
socs is that there isn't a lot of discoverability. you just
need to know what hardware you're running on. and
touching stuff that's not there is often fatal. so, for
instance,
SOC? 4 arms is more fun to try and boot than 1.
brucee
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 2:13 PM, ron minnich wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Eris Discordia
> wrote:
>> If given a choice I'd go with something that does not generate
>> the heat in the first place.
>
> agree. Get an ARM :=)
>
> ro
12 matches
Mail list logo
