Hi !
One question - why ?
http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/dynamic-linking/
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 1:04 AM, Tassilo Philipp
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I finished my dyncall/Plan9/x86 port - thanks again Cinap and Steve for
> pointing me into the right directions about the Plan9 calling convention,
> a
the iso on the bell labs site is built nightly so if you have that you have the
up-to-date source.
I wouldn't expect there will be a fifth edition as most of the plan9 team from
bell
labs now work at google. Having said this it might happen, it depends on the
priorities inside lucent-alcatel.
yo
> - Why is it that, when the namespace is changed in
> /cfg/$sysname/cpurc, it does not seem to be taken into account by
> the aux/listen in /rc/bin/cpurc?
dynamicly, or on reboot?
> - Why can't a modified rc/bin/service.auth not be bound via
> /cfg/$sysname/namespace?
$sysname is not set
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 05:41:24PM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote:
> > - I copied /rc/bin/service.auth to /cfg//slash and enabled
> > tcp567 and then added a bind -b of that directory to the original
> > /rc/bin/service.auth.
>
> the traditional way of doing this is to create directories
> servic
> I've tried pull (copied pull from Glenda's account to mine) but it
> didn't work. Can't remember the exact error message, but it couldn't
> find the files, apparently. Even after I'd spent ages figuring out how
> to do networking. Is there a no way to update from a source other than
> the 'net? L
Strange IP :)
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:34 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
> parseip(355.355.355.355) -> 99.99.99.99
>
> correction to parseip.c attached; test program
> included.
>
> - erik
>
> -
> #include
> #include
> #include
>
> void
> usage(void)
> {
> fprint(2, "usage: parseip [ip
OT:
Ruda, if you are located in CZ, please, contact me at cej_at_gli_cas_cz,
(s/at/@/; s/_/./, of course)
it would be nice to have some plan9ist here, I sit at Prague. Thanks!
On Sep 20, 12:59Â pm, st...@quintile.net (Steve Simon) wrote:
> > Playing with it and reading the manual (which I printed off in its
> > entirety at my college's library), I notice that it hasn't been
> > updated for eight years or so. So I'm curious; is Plan 9, Fourth
> > Edition going to be the l
Hi,
thanks for the feedback. You are right about the error... However, at the
moment, I don't have callback support on Plan9, so this is an ugly detail
that I try to build it unsuccessfully, but it doesn't block you from using
dyncall which seems to build fine on your machine.
I'm sorry for this
