Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 04:15:59 +0800
W B Hacker wrote:
The only 'glue' needed was level-shifters - discrete transistors on my OSI
Challenger II, Motorola 1488 & 1489 diode-coupled-logic on everything up until
the 16XXX derivative of the 8250 was sucked into a 'bridge'
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 06:40:03 -1000 (HST)
Tim Newsham wrote:
> >> What would be amazing would be attaching it via USB and importing its /net
> >> (or some other way of turning it into a 3G modem for plan9)
> >
> > Is there more about it than compiling inferno and simply exporting that
> > device?
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 04:15:59 +0800
W B Hacker wrote:
>
> The only 'glue' needed was level-shifters - discrete transistors on my OSI
> Challenger II, Motorola 1488 & 1489 diode-coupled-logic on everything up
> until
> the 16XXX derivative of the 8250 was sucked into a 'bridge' chipset.
>
I re
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 08:24:47 +0200
Rodriguez Faszanatas wrote:
> > If you aren't trying to build a terminal, the marvell sheevaplug
> > works well
>
> That is the point. My employer is interestet in a "non-intel" terminal.
> And yeap you're right, the beagle isn't that nice.
>
I'm almost sure G
lu...@proxima.alt.za wrote:
wikipedia agrees with lucio on this point
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micro_Channel_architecture#Marketshare_issues
The majority within IBM never wanted into that part of the market in the first
place, as it was seen as cannibalizing not only 3XXX terminal sales, bu
> wikipedia agrees with lucio on this point
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micro_Channel_architecture#Marketshare_issues
>
>> The majority within IBM never wanted into that part of the market in the
>> first
>> place, as it was seen as cannibalizing not only 3XXX terminal sales, but the
>> enti
erik quanstrom wrote:
lu...@proxima.alt.za wrote:
but by 1990 with microchannel &c. things were much more closed off.
i thought only one company ever really made microchannel,
and even they weren't terribly in earnest in the end,
except on non-PC things like RS6000.
IBM tried to recover contro
> lu...@proxima.alt.za wrote:
> >>> but by 1990 with microchannel &c. things were much more closed off.
> >> i thought only one company ever really made microchannel,
> >> and even they weren't terribly in earnest in the end,
> >> except on non-PC things like RS6000.
> >
> > IBM tried to recover c
hiro wrote:
Is the usb port speaking the standard usb storage language?
yes, to the SD card, no idea if you can do anything else with it
