On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 21:02 -0500, erik quanstrom wrote:
> > In such a setup a corrupted block from a fossil
> > partition will go undetected and could end up
> > being stored in venti. At that point it will become
> > venti "problem".
>
> it's important to keep in mind that fossil is just a writ
On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 22:36 -0500, erik quanstrom wrote:
> > You never know when end-to-end data consistency will start to really
> > matter. Just the other day I attended the cloud conference where
> > some Amazon EC2 customers were swapping stories of Amazon's networking
> > "stack" malfunctioni
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 16:52 -0700, andrey mirtchovski wrote:
> for my personal $0.02 i will say that this argument seems to revolve
> around trying to bend fossil and venti to match the functionality of
> zfs and the design decisions of the team that wrote it.
That is NOT the conversation I'm int
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:13 PM, wrote:
>> This
>> seams to be a complete Unix file system exporting solution for accesing
>> remote file systems from Plan 9.
>
> Does u9fs (which I have used extensively for many years :-|) actually
> provide proper authentication?
It does p9sk1, but it consult
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Eric Van Hensbergen
> Authentication isn't currently supported by any
of the UNIX servers (to my knowledge).
At least Inferno and one python 9p implementation do auth on Unix servers.
uriel
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Fernan Bolando
wrote:
> rio seems to work fine, but I have been getting a few 9serve.core dumps.
>
> I also get the following when running acme
> _procstart rfork_thread: Resource temporarily unavailable
> Abort trap
> and few broken pipes message.
Hm, does
> This
> seams to be a complete Unix file system exporting solution for accesing
> remote file systems from Plan 9.
Does u9fs (which I have used extensively for many years :-|) actually
provide proper authentication? I never tought of it and I will try
the following experiment once my morning c
Last year, I set up my old Okidata Microline 320 dot-matrix printer on
Plan 9 (text-only print, no postscript as I recall), but in the time
since then my old hard drive has failed and I've had to get a new
system set up. This time, I'd like to try getting it to print with gs
so I can have a few am
Criminals looking for encryption, to stop the PoPo
from snooping, need look no further.
http://www.CryptoSMS.org
It's free, it's secure, and best of all, Pigs can't break it.
--
It persisted, you evoked, yet Mohammar never locally executed in part the
landscape.
> A quick look at npfs and spfs suggests that neither support p9sk1 auth? Am
> I misreading?
one user-level 9p server/client which supports p9sk1 is Tim's python 9P library.
> rio seems to work fine, but I have been getting a few 9serve.core dumps.
that makes sense: p9p's rio (used to be 9wm) is written with X-windows
in mind. it's not a Plan 9 app.
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 08:49:57AM -0600, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
> For servers there are lots of choices, but spfs/npfs are the only ones
> (I know of) which support the UNIX extensions (for things like UID
> mapping, etc.)
A quick look at npfs and spfs suggests that neither support p9sk1 auth
On 1/26/09, Iruata Souza wrote:
> could you send me the core file? are you linking with rthreads?
>
> iru
>
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Fernan Bolando
> wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> I recently installed plan9port on an openbsd pc in order gain access
>> to acme and other tools.
>>
>> rio seems
Been getting a lot of it recently. Since I'm on MobileMe, and upas
doesn't have the folder indexing stuff that I'm looking for, I can't
use it. Is there an alternative? If so, I'll see if your command set
will work.
On Jan 25, 2009, at 8:38 PM, j...@csplan9.rit.edu wrote:
Criminals lookin
could you send me the core file? are you linking with rthreads?
iru
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Fernan Bolando
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I recently installed plan9port on an openbsd pc in order gain access
> to acme and other tools.
>
> rio seems to work fine, but I have been getting a few 9serv
> Criminals looking for encryption, to stop the PoPo
> from snooping, need look no further.
>
> http://www.CryptoSMS.org
>
> It's free, it's secure, and best of all, Pigs can't break it.
>
> --
> How will we cope after Rashid endorses the universal interview's panic?
||upas/spam
d
q
Hi all
I recently installed plan9port on an openbsd pc in order gain access
to acme and other tools.
rio seems to work fine, but I have been getting a few 9serve.core dumps.
I also get the following when running acme
_procstart rfork_thread: Resource temporarily unavailable
Abort trap
and fe
Criminals looking for encryption, to stop the PoPo
from snooping, need look no further.
http://www.CryptoSMS.org
It's free, it's secure, and best of all, Pigs can't break it.
--
How will we cope after Rashid endorses the universal interview's panic?
On Jan 25, 2009, at 3:17 PM, Jakob Praher wrote:
Hi,
Eric Van Hensbergen schrieb:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Jakob Praher wrote:
(I know of) which support the UNIX extensions (for things like UID
mapping, etc.)
There is a comprehensive list: http://9p.cat-v.org/implementations
I
Hi eric,
see my other post. I think I am open to any kind of mapping that works for me.
I have no problem setting up a plan9 like authentication scenario, since I
have only a couple of users in my scenario. Some pointers are greatly
appreciated.
thanks
Jakob
Eric Van Hensbergen schrieb:
>
Hi,
Eric Van Hensbergen schrieb:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Jakob Praher wrote:
>>>
> If you are on Linux you can use v9fs directly.
> For servers there are lots of choices, but spfs/npfs are the only ones
> (I know of) which support the UNIX extensions (for things like UID
> mapping
It sounded more like he wanted a UNIX based auth server, perhaps I misread.
-eric
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Steve Simon wrote:
>> Authentication isn't
>> currently supported by any of the UNIX servers (to my knowledge).
>
> Maybe it doesn't count in your eyes, but I use u9fs to
> Authentication isn't
> currently supported by any of the UNIX servers (to my knowledge).
Maybe it doesn't count in your eyes, but I use u9fs to serve
unix filesystems to plan9 - it supports authenticiation.
-Steve
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Jakob Praher wrote:
>
> I have read a post from Eric Van Hensbergen about paravirtualized
> filesystems. This was of interest to me, and I tried to pull npfs from
> subversion. As a client I am using the 9pfuse to mount the tree of the
> npfs server. Is this a good
Dear all,
I have read a post from Eric Van Hensbergen about paravirtualized
filesystems. This was of interest to me, and I tried to pull npfs from
subversion. As a client I am using the 9pfuse to mount the tree of the
npfs server. Is this a good match, or should I use something from the
npfs t
25 matches
Mail list logo
