Thanks alot for the suggestions! You guys are on top of things here I can
see. It's nice to have a strong community to help out with the details of a
new system. I'm looking forward to seeing how well plan9 works!
Cheers,
Jonny
> 1) Are there any valid criticisms to this approach? Everyone seems to
> agree it is superior to "lower-level" models, but are there any areas
> where this model doesn't work comparatively well?
People often ask how you would structure an operating system
around communications primitives. Certa
Woops, sorry - I actually meant the stuff referenced in the lock(2) man page,
which looks like it's not part of libthread.
-Frank
-- Original message --
From: erik quanstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 4) Finally, it looks like libthread has support for a lot of non
> 4) Finally, it looks like libthread has support for a lot of non-CSP stuff.
> Is this part used much? Or is it just there for historical and/or
> completeness reasons.
my simple search through thread.h yielded only these functions that i wouldn't
consider either part of thread/proc managemen
Hello,
I've been looking into the Bell Labs CSP-style threading model, trying a few
test programs, and watching the Russ Cox and Rob Pike movies. I have a few of
questions.
1) Are there any valid criticisms to this approach? Everyone seems to agree it
is superior to "lower-level" models, bu
