> As for the utility of the benchmarks, come on. I know there are people
> on this list who write kernel code (hmm, I seem to recall somebody
> on here who does a lot of work on networking drivers...) and they
> may find it useful to get these kinds of measurements to see if
> changes have improved
>> Is a port of lmbench considered a modified benchmark?
>> I understand you cannot publish results saying it´s the output
>> of lmbench if you changed the bechmark, but only because you
>> used a ported one...?
>>
>> Funny in any case.
>
> you're also not allowed to publish partial results. the
Hello. Has anyone gotten drawterm to work with QEMU on Mac OS X? If
so, how? Thanks.
Thanks to both of you. I've been setting up virtual machines so many
times that I forget these subtle things.
On Mar 22, 2008, at 2:06 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
Hello. How do you configure Plan 9 to support DST? I noticed that my
clock is wrong just now. Thanks.
dst is supported as long as
> Hello. How do you configure Plan 9 to support DST? I noticed that my
> clock is wrong just now. Thanks.
dst is supported as long as your timezone is set correctly.
echo $timezone|sed 1q
should give you the skinny on yout timezone. the format is
stdcode stdoffsetsec dstcode dst
Copy the correct timezone file for your locale from /adm/timezone
into /adm/timezone/local. Reboot.
Hello. How do you configure Plan 9 to support DST? I noticed that my
clock is wrong just now. Thanks.
> Is a port of lmbench considered a modified benchmark?
> I understand you cannot publish results saying it´s the output
> of lmbench if you changed the bechmark, but only because you
> used a ported one...?
>
> Funny in any case.
you're also not allowed to publish partial results. they have
rea
Is a port of lmbench considered a modified benchmark?
I understand you cannot publish results saying it´s the output
of lmbench if you changed the bechmark, but only because you
used a ported one...?
Funny in any case.
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 12:18 PM, hiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps th
I was tired and I used the wrong words.
On Mar 22, 2008, at 1:32 AM, ron minnich wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 9:44 PM, Pietro Gagliardi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It suggests to me that these calls are the lowest level of
communication with the kernel. I once thought that all system calls
Perhaps the copyright owner just wanted to make fun of intellectual property;)
11 matches
Mail list logo
